Un año crítico de la historia nazarí: Naṣr (1309-1310). Precisiones y rectificaciones

Authors

  • Antonio Peláez Rovira

Keywords:

Al-Andalus, History, Politics, Nasrids

Abstract

Aims to throw new light on the events that happened around the conquest of the Nasrid Kingdom of Granada at the beginning of sultan Nasr rule (1309-1314). From the Arabic and Christian sources, chronicles and archival documents it might be safely inferred that the Triple Alliance organized by James II, the King of Aragon, between the Kingdom of Castile, the Kingdom of Aragon and the Sultanate of Fes to attack, conquest and remove the Kingdom of Granada from the Iberian Peninsula in 1309, was defeated by sultan Nasr’s firm military control and expert diplomacy. The study highlights the decisive role of the Nasrid King in these events, and provides some precisions and rectifications on what was known about this until now.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2005-01-27

How to Cite

Peláez Rovira, A. (2005). Un año crítico de la historia nazarí: Naṣr (1309-1310). Precisiones y rectificaciones. Miscelánea De Estudios Árabes Y Hebraicos. Sección Árabe-Islam, 54, 117–142. Retrieved from https://revistaseug.ugr.es/index.php/meaharabe/article/view/14369

Issue

Vol. 54 (2005)

Section

Articles

License

The authors publishing their work in this journal agree to the following terms and conditions:

1. The authors retain the copyright and give the journal the right to be the first publication of the work and also to be licensee under a Creative Commons Attribution License which allows others to share the work, provided the author of the work and the initial publication in this journal are acknowledged.

2. Authors may make additional agreements separately for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in the journal (for example, putting it in an institutional repository or publishing it in a book), with acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

3. Authors are allowed and encouraged to electronically disseminate (for example, in institutional repositories or on their own web page) the published version of their works (publisher's post-print version) or, if not possible, the author's reviewed and accepted post-print version. This is to facilitate productive exchanges, and allow for earlier and greater citation by third parties of the published works (See The Effect of Open Access).

4. The journal accepts no responsibility for the opinions expressed by the authors.