Herophilus on the (in)visibility of respiration


  • Elena Bellini Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin



Palabras clave:

Herophilus, Aëtius, respiration, Hellenistic medicine, epistemology


Herophilus of Chalcedon’s paramount advancements in the fields of anatomy and physiology are hailed as revolutionary not only in regard to their content, but also in regard to the methodology that made them possible. Concerning this latter point, later sources concur in attributing to Herophilus the use of human dissection (and possibly even of vivisection) for research purposes, an unprecedented practice that seems to have been abandoned and then systematically retrieved only in the sixteenth century by Leonardo da Vinci and Vesalius. Herophilus’ audacity in the field of anatomical inquiry was nevertheless accompanied by a rather cautious approach to aetiology. “Let the appearances be described first, even though they are not primary” (An. Lond., XXI., 22-3): the medical practitioner must rely on what is visible, even though what is visible is not necessarily sufficient to an exhaustive comprehension of physiological phenomena, nor is it always at one’s disposal. Such a tension between the visible and the invisible, the perceptible and the imperceptible, lies at the very basis of Herophilus’ inquiry of the human body, extraordinarily lucid in defining its own limits. Through this article I propose to focus on the particular case of respiration, subject of the chapter of the Aëtian Placita known under the title Περὶ ἀναπνοῆς, as an example of the Herophilean reflection about the theoretic observability of phenomena that, far from being marginal or occasional, deserves to be recognised as a fundamental part of his epistemology.


Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.


BIGNONE, Ettore (1916), Empedocle: Studio Critico. Traduzione e commento delle testimonianze e dei frammenti. Torino, Fratelli Bocca.

BOOTH, Nathaniel (1960), «Empedocles’ Account of Breathing», The Journal of Hellenic Studies, 80: 10-15.

CASADEI, Elena (1997), «La Dottrina Corpuscolare di Asclepiade e i suoi Rapporti con la Tradizione Atomista», Elenchos, 18: 77-106.

COUGHLIN, Sean, LEITH, David & ORLY, Lewis (eds.) (2020), The Concept of Pneuma after Aristotle. Berlin, Topoi.

DEBRU, Armelle (1996), Le Corps Respirant : La pensée physiologique chez Galien. Leiden-Boston, Brill.

DEBRU, Armelle (1997), «Philosophie et Pharmacologie : la Dynamique des Substances Leptomères chez Galien», in Armelle Debru (ed.), Galen on Pharmacology ; Philosophy, History, and Medicine. Proceedings of the Vth International Galen Colloquium, Lille, 16-18 March 1995. Leiden-Boston, Brill: 85-102.

DK = DIELS, Hermann & KRANZ, Walther (eds.) (1903), Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker. Griechisch und Deutsch. Berlin, Weidmannsche Buchhandlung.

FURLEY, David J. (1957), «Empedocles and the Clepsydra», The Journal of Hellenic Studies, 77: 31-34.

FURLEY, David J. & WILKIE, James S. (eds.) (1984), Galen on respiration and the arteries. Princeton, Princeton University Press.

GALLAVOTTI, Carlo (ed.) (1975), Empedocle. Poema fisico e lustrale. Milano, Mondadori.

GRIMAUDO, Sabrina (2018), «ΛΟΓΩΙ ΘΕΩΡΗΤΟΝ. Il Principio di ‘Osservabilità Teorica’ nella Filosofia e nella Scienza Greche», Technai, 8: 169-179.

HARRIS, Charles R. S. (1973), The Heart and the Vascular System in Ancient Greek Medicine from Alcmaeon to Galen. Oxford, Oxford University Press.

KAZANTZIDIS, George (2023), «The Beauty That Lies Within: Anatomy, Mechanics and Thauma in Hellenistic Medicine», in Maria Gerolemou & George Kazantzidis (eds.), Body and Machine in Classical Antiquity. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press: 218-244.

KOLLESCH, Jutta (ed.) (2023), Galeni Definitiones Medicas. Berlin, De Gruyter.

LAMB, Walter Rangeley Maitland (ed.) (1925), Plato in Twelve Volumes. Cambridge, Harvard University Press; London, William Heinemann Ltd.

LANZA, Diego & VEGETTI, Mario (eds.) (1971), Aristotele: Opere Biologiche. Torino, UTET.

LAST, Hugh (1924), «Empedokles and his Klepsydra Again», The Classical Quarterly, 18:169-173.

LEITH, David (2012), «Pores and Void in Asclepiades’ Physical Theory», Phronesis, 57: 164-191.

LENNOX, James (ed.) (2001), Aristotle: On the Parts of Animals I-IV, Translated with an Introduction and Commentary. Oxford, Clarendon Press.

LEWIS, Orly (ed.) (2017), Praxagoras of Cos on Arteries, Pulse and Pneuma. Fragments and Interpretation. Leiden-Boston, Brill.

LLOYD, Goffrey E. R. (1964), «Experiment in early Greek Philosophy and Medicine», Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society, 10: 50-72.

LLOYD, Goffrey E. R. (1966), Polarity and analogy: two types of argumentation in early Greek thought. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

LLOYD, Goffrey E. R. (1975), «Alcmaeon and the early history of dissection», Sudhoffs Archiv, 59: 114-147.

LM = LAKS, André & MOST, Glenn W. (eds.) (2016), Les débuts de la philosophie. Des premiers penseurs grecs à Socrate. Paris, Librairie Arthème Fayard.

LONGRIGG, James (1993), Greek Rational Medicine. Philosophy and medicine from Alcmaeon to the Alexandrians. London, Routledge.

MANETTI, Daniela (2003), «Il ruolo di Asclepiade di Bitinia nell’Anonimo Londinese», in Antonio Garzya & Jacques Jouanna (eds.), Trasmissione e Ecdotica dei Testi Medici Greci. Atti del IV Convegno Internazionale Parigi 17-19 Maggio 2001. Napoli, D’Auria Editore: 335-347.

MANETTI, Daniela (ed.) (2010), Anonymus Londiniensis: De Medicina. Berlin, De Gruyter.

MANETTI, Daniela (2019), «Riconsiderazioni sull’Anonimo Londinese: progressi e punti ancora irrisolti», Archiv für Papyrusforschung, 40: 35-45.

MANSFELD, Jaap & RUNIA, David (1997), Aëtiana: The Method and Intellectual Context of a Doxographer, Vol. 1: The Sources. Leiden-Boston, Brill.

MANSFELD, Jaap & RUNIA, David (eds.) (2020), Aëtiana V (4 vols.): An Edition of the Reconstructed Text of the Placita with a Commentary and a Collection of Related Texts. Leiden-Boston, Brill.

MANULI, Paola & VEGETTI, Mario (1977), Cuore, sangue e cervello. Biologia e antropologia nel pensiero antico. Milano, Episteme Editrice.

O’BRIEN, Denis (1970), «The Effect of a Simile: Empedocles’ Theories of Seeing and Breathing», The Journal of Hellenic Studies, 90: 140-179.

REPICI, Luciana (ed.) (2017), La fiamma nel cuore. Aristotele: Lunghezza e brevità della vita, Gioventù e vecchiaia, La respirazione, La vita e la morte. Introduzione, traduzione e note. Pisa, Edizioni della Normale.

RICCIARDETTO, Antonio (ed.) (2016), L’Anonyme de Londres : (P.Lit.Lond. 165, Brit.Libr. inv. 137) édition et traduction d’un papyrus médical grec du Ier siècle, Liège, Presses universitaires de Liège.

ROSA, Pietro (ed.) (2009), Galenus: De Motu Musculorum. Pisa, Fabrizio Serra Editore.

SOLMSEN, Friedrich (1961), «Greek Philosophy and the Discovery of the Nerves», Museum Helveticum, 4: 169-197.

TIMPANARO-CARDINI, Maria (1957), «Respirazione e clessidra (Empedocle fr. 100)», La parola del passato, 12: 250-270.

VALLANCE, John T. (ed.) (1990), The Lost Theory of Asclepiades of Bithynia. Oxford, Oxford University Press.

VALLANCE, John T. (1993), «The Medical System of Asclepiades of Bithynia», Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt, 37: 684-703.

VAN DER EIJK, Philip J. (ed.) (1999), Ancient Histories of Medicine. Essays in Medical Doxography and Historiography in Classical Antiquity. Leiden-Boston, Brill.

VEGETTI, Mario (1997), «Tra il sapere e la pratica: la medicina ellenistica», in Mirko D. Grmek (ed.), Storia del Pensiero medico occidentale. Antichità e Medioevo. Bari, Laterza: 73-120.

VEGETTI, Mario (2018), «L’epistemologia della medicina ellenistica», Lexicon Philosophicum, Special Issue: 264-278.

VEGETTI, Mario (2021) (ed.), Tertulliano: L’Anima. Milano, La Vita Felice.

VON STADEN, Heinrich (1996), «Body and Machine: Interactions between Medicine, Mechanics, and Philosophy in Early Alexandria», in Alexandria and Alexandrianism. Malibu, The J. Paul Getty Museum: 85-98.

VON STADEN, Heinrich (2000), «Body, Soul, and Nerves: Epicurus, Herophilus, Erasistratus, the Stoics, and Galen», in John P. Wright & Paul Potter (eds.), Psyche and Soma: Physicians and Metaphysicians on the Mind-Body Problem from Antiquity to Enlightenment. Oxford, Clarendon Press: 79-116.

VS = VON STADEN, Heinrich (ed.) (1989), Herophilus, The Art of Medicine in Early Alexandria. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

WRIGHT, Maureen. R. (ed.) (1981), Empedocles: The Extant Fragments, New Haven and London, YUP.




Cómo citar

Bellini, E. (2024). Herophilus on the (in)visibility of respiration. Florentia Iliberritana, 34, 71–94. https://doi.org/10.30827/floril.v34.29052