Communication-and-Activity Approach and Formation of Rhetorical Competence at School with Non-Russian Language of Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30827/cre.v14i0.6596Keywords:
communicative person, rhetorical competence, the Russian language, literature, school, techniqueAbstract
Communication-and-activity approach stipulated new tasks in teaching “Russian Language and Literature” subject at school with non-Russian language of study. Practical task prevailed, i.e., the formation of skills of the effective communication, teaching speech activity. At such an approach, the rhetorical competence as the factor of effective communication and the formation of the ability to reproduce productive speech actions requires studying. The tasks of the Kazakhstani textbook for the 6th grade of the general education school became the materials for description. It is shown how understanding, interpretation, analysis, evaluation of a literary text contribute to the development of critical thinking and the formation of creative approach. The techniques of developing the skills of illocutionary impact on the listener in students are analyzed which is justified by the advantages of neo-rhetorical (discourse) approach. Thus, the methods of applying rhetorical argumentation, rhetorical canon, the techniques of building an oratorical statement for the effective communication are established; the interaction of creative and receptive competences while working with the rhetorical model of the artwork is shown. The techniques of forming the rhetorical competence as a method of upbringing the self-determination of a person are described in order to apply the knowledge in social reality.Downloads
References
ANDERSON, J.W., KRATHWHOL, D.R., AIRASIA, P.W. (2003): A Taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing: a revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of education. Person Education, New York.
ANNUSHKIN, V.I. (2006): Russkaya filosofiya i sovremennye nauki o rechi ‒ slove ‒ yazyke. In: Ritorika i kultura rechi v sovremennom obschestve i obrazovanii: mat. Х-оi mezhdunar. konf. Po ritorike. Nauka, Moscow. pp. 30-35.
BEZMENOVA, N.А. (1991): Ocherki po teorii i istorii ritoriki. Nauka, Moscow.
BLOOM, B. (1971): Taxonomy of educational objectives. Handbook on formative and summative evaluation of student learning/ Hastings, Madaus, McGraw-Hili, inc.
CHUVAKIN, А.А. (2014a): Vstrechnoye dvizheniye filologii i kommunikativnykh nauk. Altai University Publishing House, Barnaul.
CHUVAKIN, А.А. (2014b): Kommunikativnoye obrazovaniye i filologiya. Struktury i funktsii. Altai University Publishing House, Barnaul.
DRIDZE, Т.М. (1984): Tekstovaya deyatelnost’ v strukture sotsialnoy kommunikatsii. Problemy semisotsiopsikhologii. Nauka, Moscow.
FADEL, CH., BIALIK, M., TRILLING B. (2017): Chetyrekhmernoye obrazovaniye. [Online] Available: http://www.skolkovo.ru/public/images/stories/news/2016/SKOLKOVO_SEDeC_4D_Education.pdf (January 5, 2017).
ILYIN, I.P. (2013): Psikhologiya obscheniya i mezhlichnostnykh otnosheniy. A.M. Gorky Print Yard, St. Petersburg.
KHABERMAS, J. (2014): Dva modusa yazykovogo upotrebleniya. In: Filologiya v sisteme sovremennogo gumanitarnogo znaniya. Altai University Publishing House, Barnaul. pp. 140-144.
KENDALL, John S, MARZANO, Robert J. (2007): New Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Teacher Librarian, April, № 11.
MILOSLAVSKIY, I.G. (2011): Pravila vmesto smysla. Znamya. [Online] Available: http://magazines.russ.ru/znamia/2011/12/mi14.html.
OVSYANNIKOVA, Т.G. (2017): Ritoricheskaya podgotovka sovremennogo uchitelya – оsnova formirovaniya chitatelskoy kompetentsii shkolnikov. In: Sbornik materialov XХI Mezhdunarodnoy nauchnoy konferentsii po ritorike, 1–3 fevralya 2017g. A.S. Pushkin State Institute of the Russian Language. RAS, Moscow. pp. 345-353.
PISARUK, G.V. (2008): Metodika prepodavaniya russkogo yazyka v voprosakh i otvetakh. Akademiya, Brest.
SALNIKOVA, О.А. (2017): Model kommunikativnoy lichnosti. In: Sbornik materialov XХI Mezhdunarodnoy nauchnoy konferentsii po ritorike, 1–3 fevralya 2017g. A.S. Pushkin State Institute of the Russian Language. RAS, Moscow. pp. 396-401.
SERGEYEV, Y. (2017): Obrazovaniye ‒ eto obraz buduschego. [Online] Available: https://eadaily.com/ru/news/2017/09/30/obrazovanie-eto-obraz-budushchego-intervyu-s-ekspertom.
SMELKOVA, Z.S., IPPOLITOVA, N.А., LADYZHENSKAYA, Т.А. etc. (2011): Ritorika. Prospekt, Moscow.
TYUPA, I.V. (2008): Diskursnyi analiz. In: Analiz khudozhestvennogo teksta. “Akademiya” Publishing Center, Moscow. pp. 273-299.
Filologiya v sisteme sovremennogo gumanitarnogo znaniya (2014). Altai University Publishing House, Barnaul.
VAN DIJK, Т.А. (1989): Yazik. Poznaniye. Kommunikatsiya. Progress, Moscow.
VIKULINA, М.А, SMIRNOVA, N.М. (2010): Kultura obscheniya v studencheskoy srede vuza. R.E. Alekseev Nizhny Novgorod Technical University, Novgorod. pp. 40-41.
YEROKHINA, Е.L., KNYAZEVA, О.Y. (2017): Opredeleniye ponyatiya “kommunikativnaya kultura”: ritoricheskiy podkhod. Ritorika i kultura rechi v sovremennom nauchno-pedagogicheskom protsesse i obschestvenno-kommunikativnoy praktike. In: Sbornik materialov XХI Mezhdunarodnoy nauchnoy konferentsii po ritorike, 1–3 fevralya 2017 g. A.S. Pushkin State Institute of the Russian Language, RAS, Moscow. pp. 149-152.
ZARETSKAYA, Е.N. (2002): Ritorika: Teoriya i praktika rechevoy kommunikatsii. Delo, Moscow.