“Quo vadis”, pedagogics: on the rational and mystical way of acquiring the human
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30827/cre.v12i0.5279Keywords:
human nature, education, the Oriental and Western cultural types, dialogue, human-oriented approachAbstract
“Deepening” and “expansion” of man is the essence of differences that lie between Oriental and Western cultures. On the basis of a comparative analysis of the two civilizations – the Oriental and Western cultural types centered around different understanding of human nature, the principle of human-oriented approach in the design and implementation of the education system is revealed: to identify, disclose and realize human potential.Downloads
References
ANIKEYEVA, Ye.N. (1998): "DIALOG tsivilizatsiy: Vostok - Zapad", Voprosy filosofii, 2, S. 171 - 187.
BAKHTIN, M.M. (1979): Problemy poetiki Dostoyevskogo. Sovetskaya Rossiya. Moskva.
VEBER, M. (1994): Izbrannoye. Obraz obshchestva. Moskva.
Vyskazyvaniya indeyskikh vozhdey i stareyshin.
http://poselenie.ucoz.ru/publ/vyskazyvanija_indeyskih_vozhdey_i_stareyshin/1-1-0-495
GESSE, G. (1982): "K moim yaponskim chitatelyam". Vostok-Zapad. Issledovaniya. Perevody. Publikatsii. Moskva.
DZHURINSKIY, A.N. (2000): Istoriya pedagogiki: Uchebnoye posobiye dlya studentov pedvuzov. VLADOS, Moskva.
GIBRAN, KH. (2008): The Wanderer. Rajpal&Sons. Delhi.
Istoriya uspekha Vladimira Malyavina. Interv'yu na radio «FinamFM».
http://finam.fm/archive-view/2878/
KARSAVIN, L.P. (1992): "Vostok, Zapad i russkaya ideya", Russkaya ideya, S. 70 - 110.
KOROL', A.D. (2013): "Stereotip kak obrazovatel'naya problema", Voprosy filosofii, 10, S. 156 - 162.
KHUTORSKOY, A.V. (2005) Metodika lichnostno-oriyentirovannogo obucheniya: Kak obuchat' vsekh po-raznomu. Posobiye dlya uchitelya. VLADOS. Moskva.
KHUTORSKOY, A.V. (2001): Sovremennaya didaktika: Uchebnik dlya vuzov. Piter. Sankt-Peterburg.
KHUTORSKOY, A.V. (2012): "Nyneshniye standarty nuzhno menyat', napolnyat' ikh metapredmetnym soderzhaniyem obrazovaniya", Narodnoye obrazovaniye, 4, S. 36 - 48.
LYSENKO, V.G., RUBETS, M.V. (2015): "Atomizm / atomisticheskiy podkhod v fizike i matematike i kul'turnyy kontekst". Materialy "kruglogo stola", Voprosy filosofii, 5, S. 131 - 157.
MEZHUYEV, V.M. (2011): "Dialog kak sposob mezhkul'turnogo obshcheniya v sovremennom mire", Voprosy filosofii, 9, S. 65 - 73.
NEEDHAM, J. (1962): Science and Civilization in China. Volume 4. Physics and Physical Technology, Part. 1. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge.
POMERANTS, G.S. (2013): Dorogi dukha i zigzagi istorii. "Tsentr gumanitarnykh initsiativ". Moskva. Sankt-Peterburg.
SPIELMANN, R. (1998): “You're So Fat!”: Exploring Ojibwe Discourse. University of Toronto Press. Toronto.
STEPANYANTS, M.T. (2015): "Ot yevropotsentrizma k mezhkul'turnoy filosofii", Voprosy filosofii, 10, S. 150 - 162.
TARDE, G. (1993): Les lois de l’imitation. Éditions Kimé. Paris.
YAMAMOTO, TS. (2005): Hagakure: The Book of the Samurai. Kodansha. Tokio.
TOLSTOY, L.N. (2013) L.N. Tolstoy i Indiya. Perepiska / sost., Avt. vved. i primech. T.N. Zagorodnikova; Gos. muzey L.N. Tolstogo Min-va kul'tury RF; In-t vostokovedeniya RAN. Nauka. Moskva.
TSZIZHU, CH. (1997) "Skazhu li, kak podobayet starshemu?" V kn .: Kniga mudrykh radostey. Moskva.
ZIMBARDO, PH. (2008): The Time Paradox: The new psychology of time that will change your life. Simon&Schuster. New York.
