Barra lateral de artículos

Enviado
February 24, 2021
Aceptado
May 21, 2021
Publicado
July 26, 2021
Descargar
PDF PDF (English)
Estadística
Leer contador : 353 Descargar : 350

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Contenido del artículo principal

Resumen

El estudio presente, que parte de una investigación realizada a través del método Delphi, quiere poner de relieve los diferentes tipos de barreras que han de tenerse en cuenta para la planificación y el desarrollo adecuado de las llamadas ecologías de aprendizaje, que atienden primordialmente a la integración de múltiples contextos (presenciales, virtuales e híbridos), ambientes (formales, no formales e informales) y recursos para el aprendizaje, especialmente las TIC.


De este modo, podría resultar de utilidad conocer los obstáculos que impiden aprovechar las oportunidades formativas que proporcionen los diferentes ecosistemas de aprendizaje mediados por las TIC, sea, por ejemplo, para mantener la continuidad de procesos educativos formales a través de contextos diversos, como los virtuales o híbridos, que en la práctica efectiva se han empleado como alternativa para llevar a cabo las actividades formativas que la pandemia impide desarrollar en ambientes presenciales.

Palabras clave

ecologías de aprendizaje, aprendizaje en línea, TIC, barreras al aprendizaje

Detalles del artículo

Biografía del autor/a

María José Vázquez Cancelo, Universidade da Coruña

Máster en Educación y TIC

Eduardo Rodríguez Machado, Universidad de A Coruña

Profesor Asociado . Departamento de Pedagogía y Didáctica. Facultad de Ciencias de la Educación. Universidad de A Coruña

Orientación del CEIP Raquel Camacho (A Coruña)

Docente Colaborador en varias universidades UNIR, VIU, UNED.

Doctor por la Universidad de A Coruña. Premio Extraordinario

Máster en Dirección, Gestión e Innovación de Instituciones Escolares y Socioeducativas

Cómo citar
Santos Caamaño, F. J., Vázquez Cancelo, M. J. ., & Rodríguez Machado, E. R. (2021). Obstáculos en el desarrollo de las ecologías de aprendizaje: un desafío a la formación expandida en los escenarios de pandemia. PUBLICACIONES, 51(3), 497–531. https://doi.org/10.30827/publicaciones.v51i3.18512
Descargar cita
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Referencias

  1. Adler, M., & Ziglio, E. (1996). Gazing into the oracle: The Delphi method and its application to social policy and public health. London, UK: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
  2. Attwell, G. (2007). Personal Learning Enviroments-the future of eLearning? Elearning papers, 2(1), 1-8. https://vcut.org/345.pdf&hl=es&sa=T&oi=gsb-gga&ct=res&cd=0&d=4529383974035248294&ei=2e_gX_qNIo-Ny9YPt6-10Ac&scisig=AAGBfm0z5ta8qbrBLorNie-XD35vp2v5jQ.
  3. Bakker, A., & Akkerman, S. F. (2014). A boundary-crossing approach to support students’ integration of statistical and work-related knowledge. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 86(2), 223-237. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-013-9517-z.
  4. Banks, J., Au, K., Ball, A., Bell, P., Gordon, E., Gutierrez, K., Heath, S., Lee, C. Lee. Y., Mahiri, J., Nasir, N., Valdés, G., & Zhou, M. (2007). Learning in and out of school in diverse environments. Life-long, Life-wide, Life-deep. (Consensus Report). Learning in Informal and Formal Environment (LIFE) Center. http://life-slc.org/docs/Banks_etal-LIFE-Diversity-Report.pdf.
  5. Barab, S. A., & Roth, W. M. (2006). Curriculum-based ecosystems: Supporting knowing from an ecological perspective. Educational researcher, 35(5), 3-13. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X035005003.
  6. Barron, B. (2006a). Interest and self-sustained learning as catalysts of development: A learning ecology perspective. Human development, 49(4), 193-224. https://doi.org/10.1159/000094368.
  7. Barron, B. (2006b). Configurations of Learning Settings and Networks - Implications of a Learning Ecology Perspective. Human Development, 49(4), 229-231. https://doi.org/10.1159/000094370.
  8. Becket, D., & Hager, P. (2002). Life, work and learning. Practice in postmodernity. New York: Routledge.
  9. Becker, S. A., Brown, M., Dahlstrom, E., Davis, A., DePaul, K., Díaz, V., & Pomerantz, J. (2018). NMC Horizon Report: 2018 Higher Education edition. Louisville. CO: EDUCAUSE. https://library.educause.edu/~/media/files/library/2018/8/2018horizonreport.pdf.
  10. Billet, S. (2001). Learning in the workplace: Strategies for effective practice. Crows Nest (Australia): Allen y Unwin.
  11. Bourgoin, E. C., Ferreiro, O., & Méndez, R. (2020). España frente a la COVID-19: un recorrido por las trincheras políticas, sociales y educativas. Cadernos do Tempo Presente, 11(1). 46-58. https://www.revista.ufs.br/index.php/tempo/article/view/14136/10767
  12. Boyer, S., Edmonson, D., Artis, A., & Fleming, D. (2014). Self-Directed Learning. A Tool for Lifelong Learning. Journal of Marketing Education, 36, 20-32, https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475313494010.
  13. Brady, S. R. (2015). Utilizing and adapting the Delphi method for use in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 14(5), 1–6. https ://doi.org/10.1177/16094 06915 621381
  14. Bull, G., Thompson, A., Searson, M., Garofalo, J., Park, J., Young, C., & Lee, J. (2008). Connecting informal and formal learning: Experiences in the age of participatory media. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 8(2), 100-107. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/29328/.
  15. Cabero-Almenara, J., Llorente-Cejudo, C. (2020). Covid-19: transformación radical de la digitalización en las instituciones universitarias. Campus Virtuales, 9(2), 25-34. http://www.uajournals.com/ojs/index.php/campusvirtuales/article/viewFile/713/410
  16. Çetinkaya, L., & Keser, H. (2018). Adaptation of interaction in web environments with educational content. World Journal on Educational Technology: Current Issues, 10(3), 142–152. https://doi.org/10.18844/wjet.v10i3.3555.
  17. Charro, E. (2020). A curricular Delphi study to improve the science education of secondary school students in Spain. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 58(2), 282-304. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21655
  18. Christen, N., Sangrà, A., & González-Sanmamed, M. (2016). Supporting the Capacity Development of Canadian Entrepreneurial Mothers through an Exploration of their Digital Learning Ecologies. En A. Volungeviciene, A. Szűcs, & I. Mázár (Eds.). Forging new pathways of research and innovation in open and distance learning: Reaching from the roots (pp. 323-328). Oldenburg.
  19. Cilliers, P. (2005). Complexity, deconstruction and relativism. Theory, Culture & Society, 22(5), 255–267. https ://doi.org/10.1177/02632 76405 058052.
  20. Coomey, M., & Stephenson, J. (2001). Online learning: It is all about dialogue, involvement, support and control – According to the research. En J. Stephenson (Ed.), Teaching and learning online: Pedagogies for new technologies (pp. 37–52). London: Kogan Page.
  21. Cyphert, F. R., & Gant, W. L. (1971). The Delphi technique: A case study. Phi Delta Kappa, 52, 272–273.
  22. De la Selva, A. (2015). Los nuevos rostros de la desigualdad en el siglo XXI: la brecha digital. Revista mexicana de ciencias políticas y sociales, 60(223), 265-285. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0185-1918(15)72138-0
  23. Díez-Gutiérrez, E. J., & Gajardo-Espinoza, K. (2020). Políticas educativas en tiempos de coronavirus: La confrontación ideológica en España. Revista Internacional de Educación para la Justicia Social, 9(3), 83-101. https://doi.org/10.15366/riejs2020.9.3.005
  24. Donohoe, H., Stellefson, M., & Tennant, B. (2012). Advantages and limitations of the e-Delphi technique: Implications for health education researchers. American Journal of Health Education, 43(1), 38–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/19325 037.2012.10599216.
  25. Downes, S. (2012). Connectivism and connective knowledge. Essays on meaning and learning networks. National Research Council Canada. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/4718/ee3c1930820e094552f0933cbc3b86548dbc.pdf.
  26. Eraut, M. (2000). Non‐formal learning and tacit knowledge in professional work. British journal of educational psychology, 70(1), 113-136. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709900158001.
  27. Foresto E. (2020). Aprendizajes formales, no formales e informales. Una revisión teórica holistica. Contextos de Educación, 29 (21). http://www2.hum.unrc.edu.ar/ojs/index.php/contextos/article/download/1142/1234.
  28. García-Peñalvo, F. J., & Corell, A. (2020). La CoVId-19 ¿enzima de la transformación digital de la docencia o reflejo de una crisis metodológica y competencial en la educación superior? Campus Virtuales, 9(2), 83-98. http://hdl.handle.net/10366/144140
  29. González-Sanmamed, M., Sangrà, A., & Muñoz-Carril, P. C. (2017). We can, we know how. But do we want to? Teaching attitudes towards ICT based on the level of technology integration in schools. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 26(5), 633-647.
  30. González-Sanmamed, M., Estévez, I., Souto-Seijo, A., & Muñoz-Carril, P. C. (2020). Ecologías digitales de aprendizaje y desarrollo profesional del docente universitario. Comunicar. Revista Científica de Comunicación y Educación, 28(62), 9-12. https://doi.org/10.3916/C62-2020-01.
  31. González‐Sanmamed, M., Muñoz‐Carril, P. C., & Santos‐Caamaño, F. J. (2019a). Key components of learning ecologies: A Delphi assessment. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(4), 1639-1655. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/bjet.12805.
  32. González-Sanmamed, M., Souto-Seijo, A., González, I., & Estévez, I. (2019b). Aprendizaje informal y desarrollo profesional: análisis de las ecologías de aprendizaje del profesorado de educación infantil. Edutec. Revista Electrónica De Tecnología Educativa, (68), 70-81. https://doi.org/10.21556/edutec.2019.68.1305.
  33. González-Sanmamed, M., Sangrà, A., Souto-Seijo, A., & Estévez, I. (2020). Learning ecologies in the digital era: challenges for higher education. Publicaciones, 50(1), 83–102. https://doi.org/10.30827/publicaciones.v50i1.15671
  34. Gouthro, P. A. (2017): The promise of lifelong learning. International. Journal of Lifelong Education, 36 (1-2), 45-59. https://doi.org/10.1080/02601370.2017.1270067.
  35. Hager, P. (1998). Recognition of informal learning: challenges and issues. Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 50(4), 521-535. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/13636829800200064
  36. Howard, S. K. (2013). Risk-aversion: Understanding teachers’ resistance to technology integration. Technology, pedagogy and Education, 22(3), 357-372. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2013.802995
  37. Jackson, N. J. (2013). The Concept of Learning Ecologies. En N. J. Jackson, & G. B. Cooper (Eds.), Lifewide Learning Education and Personal Development (pp.1-21). http://www.lifewideebook.co.uk/uploads/1/0/8/4/10842717/chapter_a5.pdf.
  38. Jarvis, P. (2007). Globalization, lifelong learning, and the learning society: Sociological Perspectives. Abingdon: Routledge.
  39. Jarvis, P. (2014). From adult education to lifelong learning and beyond. Comparative Education, 50(1), 45–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2013.871832
  40. Keeney, S., Hasson, F., & McKenna, H. (2011). The Delphi technique in nursing and health research. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. https ://doi.org/10.1002/97814 44392029.
  41. Knowles, M. S. (1975). Self-directed learning: A guide for learners and teachers. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  42. Linstone, H. A., & Turoff, M. (1975). The Delphi method: Techniques and applications. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  43. Livingstone, D. W. (2001). Adults’ Informal Learning: Definitions, Findings, Gaps, and Future Research. NALL Working Paper #21. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED452390.pdf.
  44. López-Gómez, E. (2018). El método Delphi en la investigación actual en educación: una revisión teórica y metodológica. Educación XXI, 21(1), 17–40. https://doi.org/10.5944/educx x1.20169.
  45. Luckin, R. (2008). The learner centric ecology of resources: A framework for using technology to scaffold learning. Computers & Education, 50(2), 449-462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2007.09.018.
  46. Luckin, R. (2010). Re-designing learning contexts. Technology-rich, learner-centred ecologies. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203854754.
  47. Maina, M. F., & González, I. G. (2016). Articulating personal pedagogies through learning ecologies. En B. Gros, C. Kinshuk, & M. Maina (Eds.), The Future of Ubiquitous Learning: Learning Designs for Emerging Pedagogies (pp. 73-.94). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-47724-3_5.
  48. McIntyre-Hite, L. (2016). A Delphi study of effective practices for developing competency-based learning models in higher education. The Journal of Competency-Based Education, 1, 157–166. https ://doi.org/10.1002/cbe2.1029.
  49. Manuti, A., Pastore, S., Scardigno, A., Giancaspro, M., & Morciano, D. (2015). Formal and informal learning in the workplace: a research review. International journal of training and development, 19(1), 1-17. http://www.academia.edu/download/44528973/Formal_and_informal_learning_in_the_work20160408-3135-10ztkix.pdf.
  50. Mason R., & Rennie F. (2008). E-learning and social networking handbook: Resources for higher education (1st ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
  51. Miles, M. B., Huberman, M. A., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis. A Methods Sourcebook. Los Angeles: Sage
  52. Mirata, V., Hirt, F., Bergamin, P., & Van der Westhuizen, C. (2020). Challenges and contexts in establishing adaptive learning in higher education: findings from a Delphi Study. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00209-y
  53. Mohr, S. C., & Shelton, K. (2017). Best practices framework for online faculty professional development: A Delphi study. Online Learning Journal, 21(4), 123–140. https://doi.org/10.24059/ olj.v21i4.1273.
  54. Nardi, B. (1996). Studying context: a comparison of activity theory, situated action models, and distributed cognition. En B. Nardi (Ed.), Context and consciousness: activity theory and human-computer interaction (pp. 69-102). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  55. Nasir, N. I. S., & Cooks, J. (2009). Becoming a hurdler: How learning settings afford identities. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 40(1), 41-61. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1548-1492.2009.01027.x.
  56. Oddone, K., Hughes, H., & Lupton, M. (2019). Teachers as connected professionals: A model to support professional learning through personal learning networks. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 20(3). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v20i4.4082.
  57. Okoli, C., & Pawlowski, S. D. (2004). The Delphi method as a research tool: An example, design considerations and applications. Information & Management, 42(1), 15–29.
  58. https ://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2003.11.002
  59. Pozzi, F., Manganello, F., Passarelli, M., Persico, D., Brasher, A., Holmes, W.,Whitelock, D., & Sangrà, A. (2019). Ranking Meets Distance Education: Defining Relevant Criteria and Indicators for Online Universities. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 20(5), 42-63. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v20i5.4391.
  60. Prestridge, S. (2018). Categorising teachers’ use of social media for their professional learning: A self-generating professional learning paradigm. Computers & Education, 129, 143-158. https://doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2018.11.003.
  61. Rogoff, B., Callanan, M., Gutiérrez, K. D., & Erickson F. (2016). The Organization of Informal Learning. Review of Research in Education, 40(1), 356-401. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X16680994
  62. Rowe, G., & Wright, G. (1999). The Delphi technique as a forecasting tool: Issues and analysis. International Journal of Forecasting, 15(4), 353–375. https ://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2070(99)00018-7).
  63. Saldaña, J. (2009). The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. California: Sage
  64. Sanabria, A., & Hernández, C. M. (2011). Percepción de los estudiantes y profesores sobre el uso de las TIC en los procesos de cambio e innovación en la enseñanza superior. Aloma: revista de psicologia, ciències de l’educació i de l’esport Blanquerna, 273-290. https://www.raco.cat/index.php/Aloma/article/download/248394/332518
  65. Sharar, B. (2016). Emergent Pedagogy in England: A Critical Realist Study of Structure-Agency Interactions in Higher Education. Nueva York, NY: Routledge.
  66. Skulmoski, G., Hartman, F., & Krahn, J. (2007). The Delphi method for graduate research. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 6(1), 1–21. https ://doi.org/10.28945/ 199
  67. Trujillo-Sáez, F., Fernández-Navas, M., Montes-Rodríguez, M., Segura-Robles, A., Alaminos-Romero, F. J., & Postigo-Fuentes, A. Y. (2020). Panorama de la educación en España tras la pandemia de COVID-19: la opinión de la comunidad educativa. Madrid: Fad. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo-3878844
  68. Williams, R., Karousou, R., & Mackness, J. (2011). Emergent learning and learning ecologies in Web 2.0. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 12(3), 39–59. https ://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v12i3.883.
  69. Zakaria, F. (2020). Ten lessons for a postpandemic world. New York, NY: Norton
  70. Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (Eds.). (2012). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theory, research, and practice. New york, NY:Springer.