Beginning High School Teachers’ Organization of Students for Learning and Methods for Teaching Mathematics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30827/pna.v15i1.10748Palabras clave:
opportunity to learn, organizing students for learning, teaching practicesResumen
We observed eight beginning secondary mathematics teachers’ classrooms to investigate which they organized students for learning, uses of instructional methods, and how these may differ based on the level of course being taught. We found that beginning teachers frequently organize their students to learn collaboratively – either in small groups or as a whole class – coupled with an abundance of teacher directed instruction. Differences in organizations, teaching methods, and associated learning opportunities between course levels also exist. Implications for supporting practicing teachers and preparing prospective teachers to establish collaborative learning environments and utilize student centered teaching methods are discussed.
Descargas
Citas
Association of Mathematics Teacher Educators. (2017). Standards for Preparing Teachers of Mathematics. Retrieved from https://amte.net/standards.
Banilower, E. R., Smith, P. S., Weiss, I. R., Malzahn, K. A., Campbell, K. M., & Weis, A. M. (2013). Report of the 2012 national survey of science and mathematics education. Horizon Research, INC.
Boston, M. D., & Smith, M. S. (2009). Transforming secondary mathematics teaching: Increasing the cognitive demands of instructional tasks used in teachers’ classrooms. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 40(2), 119-156. https://doi.org/10.2307/40539329
Carroll, J. B. (1963). A model of school learning. Teachers College Record, 64(8), 723-733.
Fey, J. T. (1979). Mathematics teaching today: Perspectives from three national surveys. Mathematics Teacher, 72(7), 490-504.
https://doi.org/10.5951/AT.27.2.0010
Gee, J. P. (2008). A sociocultural perspective on opportunity to learn. In P. A. Moss, D. C. Pullin, J. P. Gee, E. H. Haertel, & L. J. Young (Eds.), Assessment, Equity, and Opportunity to Learn (pp. 76–108). Cambridge University Press.
Haberman, M. (1991). The pedagogy of poverty versus good teaching. Phi Delta Kappan, 73(4), 290–294.
Hiebert, J., Stigler, J. W., Jacobs, J. K., Givvin, K. B., Garnier, H., Smith, M., … Gallimore, R. (2005). Mathematics teaching in the United States today (and tomorrow): Results from the TIMSS 1999 video study. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 27(2), 111-132.
Husén, T. (Ed.). (1967). International study of achievement in mathematics: A comparison of twelve countries. Wiley.
Jacobs, J. K., Hiebert, J., Givvin, K. B., Hollingsworth, H., Garnier, H., & Wearne, D. (2006). Does eighth-grade mathematics teaching in the United States align with the NCTM “standards?” Results from the TIMSS 1995 and 1999 video studies. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 37(1), 5-32. https://doi.org/10.2307/30035050
Jones, K. K., & Byrnes, J. P. (2006). Characteristics of students who benefit from high-quality mathematics instruction. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 31(3), 328-343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2005.10.002
McKinney, S., & Frazier, W. (2008). Embracing the Principles and Standards for School Mathematics: An Inquiry into the Pedagogical and Instructional Practices of Mathematics Teachers in High-Poverty Middle Schools. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 81(5), 201-210. https://doi.org/10.3200/TCHS.81.5.201-210
NCTM. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. National Council of Teacher of Mathematics.
NCTM. (1991). Professional standards for teaching mathematics. National Council of Teacher of Mathematics
NCTM. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. National Council of Teacher of Mathematics
NCTM. (2014). Principles to actions: Ensuring mathematical success for all. National Council of Teacher of Mathematics
Otten, S., Cirillo, M., & Herbel-Eisenmann, B. A. (2015). Making the most of going over homework. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 21(2), 98-105.
Perry, A. (2013). Equitable spaces in early career mathematics classrooms. Raleigh, NC.
Rakes, C. R., Valentine, J. C., McGatha, M. B., & Ronau, R. N. (2010). Methods of instructional improvement in algebra: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 80(3), 372-400. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654310374880
Stein, M. K., Grover, B. W., & Henningsen, M. (1996). Building student capacity for mathematical thinking and reasoning: An analysis of mathematical tasks used in reform classrooms. American Educational Research Journal, 33(2), 455-488.
https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312033002455
Stein, M. K., & Smith, M. S. (2011). Five Practices for Orchestrating Productive Mathematics Discussions. National Council of Teacher of Mathematics
Tate, W. F. (1995). School mathematics and african american students: Thinking seriously about opportunity-to-learn standards. Educational Administration Quarterly, 31(3), 424-448. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X95031003006
Weiss, I. R., Pasley, J. D., Smith, P. S., Banilower, E. R., & Heck, D. J. (2003). Highlights report, looking inside the classroom: A study of K-12 mathematics and science education in the United States. Horizon Research, Inc.
Descargas
Publicado
Número
Sección
