Spain and the Suez Crisis. A brief illusion 60 years ago (1956)
Keywords:
Suez, Constantinople Convention, United States, France, IsraelAbstract
The crisis of Suez meant a brief period of time in the second half of 1956 during which, Spain believed to be able to act as a leading country in the solution of an international crisis which involved the main Western powers. Spain took part in the London Conference because she was one of the signatory states of the Convention of Constantinople that regulated the use of the Channel since 1888. In the meetings, Madrid advanced a proposal of solution, approaching the problem from the legal angle, which had the support neither of the rest of the attendants nor of Egypt, although it was included as an annex in the final resolution. Secondary actor throughout the crisis, Spain eventually understood what her position really was and that she could not put at risk her precarious international position within the Western world because of a traditional friendship with the Arabs that did not bring any gain in her international standing.Downloads
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The authors publishing their work in this journal agree to the following terms and conditions:
1. The authors retain the copyright and give the journal the right to be the first publication of the work and also to be licensee under a Creative Commons Attribution License which allows others to share the work, provided the author of the work and the initial publication in this journal are acknowledged.
2. Authors may make additional agreements separately for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in the journal (for example, putting it in an institutional repository or publishing it in a book), with acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are allowed and encouraged to electronically disseminate (for example, in institutional repositories or on their own web page) the published version of their works (publisher's post-print version) or, if not possible, the author's reviewed and accepted post-print version. This is to facilitate productive exchanges, and allow for earlier and greater citation by third parties of the published works (See The Effect of Open Access).
4. The journal accepts no responsibility for the opinions expressed by the authors.