Urban penalty and health reform: the case of a mining city: La Unión (1870-1913)

Authors

  • Antonio Escudero Departamento de Análisis Económico Aplicado. Área de Historia Económica Universidad de Alicante
  • José Joaquín García Gómez Departamento de Economía y Empresa. Área de Historia Económica. Universidad de Almería
  • Ángel Pascual Martínez Soto Departamento de Economía Aplicada. Área de Historia Económica. Universidad de Murcia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30827/dynamis.v39i2.9842

Keywords:

urban penalty, public health, sanitary reform, urban environmental degradation, lead contamination

Abstract

In the first part of this article, we analyze urban penalty from the perspective of market failures. In the second part, we offer data showing that La Union suffered urban penalty between 1870 and the First World War. Finally, in the third part, we quantify the expenditure invested by the city in health reform and document the failure to install condensation chambers in lead smelters in the city, despite this being a legal requirement. In conclusion, we support the hypothesis that the Union suffered an urban penalty up to the First World War because spending on health reform was insufficient and condensation chambers were not installed, which both have political explanations. The city was ruled by an oligarchy of business men, owners of mines and smelters and insensitive to the social problems. Less was invested in public health in comparison to other Spanish cities with similar populations, and public resources were used for private purposes. This same oligarchy did not comply with the state legislation requiring the introduction of condensation chambers in lead factories.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2019-12-05

How to Cite

Escudero, A., García Gómez, J. J., & Martínez Soto, Ángel P. (2019). Urban penalty and health reform: the case of a mining city: La Unión (1870-1913). Dynamis, 39(2), 403–427. https://doi.org/10.30827/dynamis.v39i2.9842