Female bodies and obstetric interventions. The medical-scientific discourse in Uruguay in the Mid-20th Century

Authors

  • Natalia Magnone Alemán Departamento de Trabajo Social de la Facultad de Ciencias Sociales, Universidad de la República https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8727-878X

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30827/dynamis.v40i2.17973

Keywords:

childbirth, obstetric science, medical intervention, body, gender

Abstract

This article aims at contributing to the understanding of the creation of unjustified medical interventionism in  childbirth care.  For  this purpose, a set of press reports about the research carried out by the Obstetric Physiology Department of the Medicine School in Uruguay in the mid-20th century is ana- lyzed. This Department played an important role in the international history of obstetric science by creating techniques and electronic devices that are part of  the current care model. In the analyzed reports, the female body is represented    as something dangerous for the fetus and capable ofcausing brain damage during labor and childbirth. In this way, the relationship between the pregnant woman and the fetus is rendered unethical, which leads to the emergence of obstetric science as responsible for preventing the harm that may be caused to  the fetus. In times when society privileged the maternal role as the central axis    for women, a new requirement was set down for good mothers: to entrust and hand over their bodies to biometric instruments in order to prevent the risk of uterine contractions harming the fetus.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2020-12-31

How to Cite

Magnone Alemán, N. (2020). Female bodies and obstetric interventions. The medical-scientific discourse in Uruguay in the Mid-20th Century. Dynamis, 40(2), 457–477. https://doi.org/10.30827/dynamis.v40i2.17973