Academic Discourse: Theory and Practice
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30827/cre.v14i0.7204Keywords:
academic discourse, intercultural differences, hedging, oral communication, understanding and production of texts, problems of teachingAbstract
This article discusses intercultural differences in academic discourse, methods of indirect communication, and the phenomenon of hedging. The article deals with theoretical and practical preparation of postgraduate students to the effective intercultural communication in academic area and to the formation of communicative competence in oral scientific speech in receptive and productive aspects. The course includes three main sections. The first section is introductory; it aims to obtaining of necessary knowledge about communication models and the mechanisms of its formation. In the second section the special attention is paid to development of public performance skills on basis of studying of institutional discourse structure and argumentation rules. In the third section intercultural differences, hedging and the genres of oral scientific communication are considered.Downloads
References
BACHTIN, M.M. (1986): Estetika slovesnogo tvorchestva. Iskusstvo. Moskva.
BELYAKOV, M.V. (2015): Harakter emotivnosti diplomaticheskogo diskursa. Russian Journal of Linguistics. #2. S. 124-132.
BOGDANOVA, L.I. (2016): Text and Discourse: Looking for a Way out of the Labyrinth. Russian Journal of Linguistics. V. 20 (3). Pp. 7-30.
BOGDANOVA, L.I. (2017): “Problemyi kommunikatsii v obrazovanii i nauke”. V kn.: Kommunikatsiya v politike, biznese i obrazovanii. Izd. Moskovskogo universiteta, Moskva. S. 82-85.
BORISOVA, A.S., RUBINSHTEYN, K.E. (2015): Pragmatika emotsiy v sovremennom reklamnom diskurse (na materiale frantsuzskogo yazyika). Russian Journal of Linguistics. 2, 133-147.
BURMAKINA, N.G. (2010): Akademicheskiy diskurs v teorii institutsionalnyih diskursov. [Elektronnyiy resurs] Rezhim dostupa: http://study-english.info/ article051.php
CALSAMIGLIA BLANCAFORT, H., TUSON VALLS, A. (2007): Las cosas del decir. Ariel linguistica. Barcelona.
CHERNYAVSKAYA, V.E. (2017): Kommunikatsiya v nauke: normativnoe i deviantnoe. Lingvisticheskiy i sotsiokulturnyiy analiz. Librokom. Moskva.
CHUGUNOV, A.A. (2014): Allyuzii i tsitatyi kak sredstvo reprezentatsii emotsiy v russkoyazyichnom i angloyazyichnom finansovom diskurse. Russian Journal of Linguistics, 3, 97-105.
DEMENT’EV, V.V. (2006): Nepryamaya kommunikatsiya: monografiya. Gnozis, Moskva.
DUBROVSKAYA, T.V. (2015): ‘I Was the First Westerner, The Only English Person’: diskursivnoe konstruirovanie natsionalnoy identichnosti. Russian Journal of Linguistics, 2, 25-40.
EZHOVA, T.V. (2007): Pedagogicheskiy diskurs i ego proektirovanie. Internet–zhurnal Eydos. Rezhim dostupa: http://www.eidos.ru/journal/2007/0930/5.htm
FAIRCLOUGH, N. (2003): Analyzing Discourse. Routledge. New-York.
FRASER, B. (1980): “Conversational mitigation”. Journal of Pragmatics. 4. Pp. 341-350.
GLUSHAK, V.M. (2008): “Hedzhing kak odno iz sostavlyayuschih epistemicheskoy modalnosti”. V kn.: Yazyik i kommunikatsiya v kontekste kulturyi. Ryazanskiy gosudarstvennyiy Universitet. Ryazan. Pp. 16–18.
GORNOSTAEVA, A.A. (2014): Ironiya v politicheskom diskurse: agressiya ili razvlechenie? Russian Journal of Linguistics. 3. Pp. 64-74.
IVANOVA, S.V. (2017) Aktovaya rech kak gibridnaya polidiskursivnaya praktika. Russian Journal of Linguistics. V. 21 (1), 141-160.
KARASIK, V.I. (2002): Yazyikovoy krug: lichnost, kontseptyi, diskurs. Peremena. Volgograd.
KECSKES, I. (2016): “A Dialogic Approach to Pragmatics”. Russian Journal of Linguistics. V. 20 (4). Pp. 26-42.
KHANBUTAEVA, L.M. (2016): Hedjingi v processe rechevogo akta. European journal of literature and linguistics. №1. S. 39-43.
KHAZAGEROV, G.G. (2017): Kommunikativnaya kul’tura v svete protivopostavleniya polemicheskogo i propovednicheskogo nachal. Russian Journal of Linguistics. V. 21 (2), 348-361.
KISELEVA, A.A. (2016): Produktivnaya kommunikatsiya. Lingvistika rezultativnosti. Gumanitarnyiy tsentr. Har’kov
LAKOFF, G. (1972): Hedges: A Study in Meaning Criteria and the Logic of Fuzzy Concepts. Chicago. Pp. 183-228.
LARINA, T. (2015): “Culture-Specific Communicative Styles as a Framework for Interpreting Linguistic and Cultural Idiosyncrasies”. In International Review of Pragmatics, V. 7, number 5. Pp. 195–215.
LARINA, T.V., OZYUMENKO, V.I. (2016). Jetnicheskaja identichnost' i ejo projavlenie v jazyke i kommunikacii. Cuadernos de Rusística Española, 12, 57 – 68. (In Russ).
LEONTOVICH, O.A. (2017): “A Mirror in which Everyone Displays their Image”: Identity Construction in Discource. Russian Journal of Linguistics. V. 21 (2). Pp. 247-259.
MARYUHIN, A.P. (2008): Yаvleniya nepryamoy kommunikatsii v sovremennyih yazyikah (russkom, angliyskom, nemetskom). Sibirskiy filologicheskiy jurnal, 3, 192-196.
MILOSLAVSKIY, I.G. (2015): Russkiy jazyk na kazhdyi den’ I navsegda. KDU. Moskva.
OZYUMENKO, V.I. (2017): Mediynyiy diskurs v situatsii informatsionnoy voyny: ot manipulyatsii – k agressii. Russian Journal of Linguistics. V. 21 (1), 203-220.
PONTON, D., LARINA, T.V. (2016): Discourse-Analysis in the 21 Century: Theory and Practice (I). Russian Journal of Linguistics. V. 20 (4). Pp. 7-25.
PONTON, D., LARINA, T.V. (2017): Discourse-Analysis in the 21 Century: Theory and Practice (II). Russian Journal of Linguistics. V. 21 (1). Pp. 7-21.
SCHIROVA, I.A. (2017): Tekst kak element integratsionnogo nauchnogo prostranstva. Russian Journal of Linguistics. V. 21 (2), 362-378.
SHTANOV, A.V., BELYIH, E.N. (2016): Osobennosti realizatsii obraznosti v turetskom politicheskom diskurse ustnogo publichnogo vyistupleniya. Russian Journal of Linguistics. V. 20 (3), 152-163.
SOUSA, A. (2017): “A Discourse-Based View in Interdisciplinary Approaches to Fictional Text Analysis”. Russian Journal of Linguistics. V. 21 (2). Pp. 390-404.
VETROVA, O.G. (2012): Kultura nauchnogo obscheniya: hedzhing v akademicheskom diskurse [Elektronnyiy resurs] Rezhim dostupa: http:/ www.gisap.eu/ru/node/5638 ZAPPETINI, F. (2017): “Transnationalism as an Index to Construct European Identities: an Analysis of ‘Transeuropean’ Discourses”. Russian Journal of Linguistics. V. 21 (2). Pp. 260-281.
