Statuses-Aphorisms in the Communicative Behavior of a Modern Linguistic Personality
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30827/cre.v19.28902Palabras clave:
linguistic personality, status aphorism, communicative behaviorResumen
In recent decades, there has been a natural increase in interest in the linguistic personality in Russian linguistics, due to the understanding of language as a mechanism for reflecting the processes of transformation of the system of cultural values, which have an unconditional impact on a person's worldview. The article examines the status-aphorisms in the communicative behavior of a modern linguistic personality, the choice of which as a research material is due, on the one hand, to their features (brevity of form, subjectivity, freedom of choice of subject matter, reproducibility, originality, situativeness), on the other hand, to the fact that they, being cognitive and pragmatic texts, are a means of evaluativeness and axiological character, a way of self-expression and self-presentation; the importance of status-aphorisms in connection with the communicative and activity need of a linguistic personality to actualize value, cognitive and behavioral attitudes in speech practice is established.
Descargas
Citas
BOGIN, G.I. (1984). Model` yazykovoj lichnosti v ee otnoshenii k raznovidnostyam tekstov. Avtoreferat dissertacii na soiskanie uchenoj stepeni doktora filologicheskix nauk. Leningrad.
CZVETKOVA, G. A. (2014) Bogatstvo v kontekste russkoj kul`tury: k postanovke problemy // Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo instituta kul`tury`, 29-2, s. 50–55.
DEJK, T. VAN (1989). Yazyk. Poznanie. Kommunikaciya. Moskva: Progress.
DEMOGRAFICHESKIJ PONYATIJNYJ SLOVAR` (2003). Pod red. prof. L.L. Rybakovskogo. Moskva: Centr social`nogo prognozirovaniya.
FORMANOVSKAYA, N.I. (1998). Kommunikativno-pragmaticheskie aspekty` edinicz obshheniya. Moskva: IKAR.
GRIGOREVA, V.S. (2007). Diskurs kak element kommunikativnogo processa: pragmalingvisticheskij i kognitivnyj aspekty. Tambov: TGTU.
IVANOV, E.E. (2022). Funkcii aforisticheskix edinicz v russkom yazyke. Rusistika, 2, s. 167–185. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2618-8163-2022-20-2-167-185
KARASIK, V.I. K. (2002). Yazykovoj krug: lichnost`, koncepty, diskurs. Volgograd: Peremena.
KARAULOV, YU.N. (2010). Russkij yazyk i yazykovaya lichnost`. Izd. 7-e. Moskva: Izdatel`stvo LKI.
KARAULOV, YU.N. (1996). Tipy kommunikativnogo povedeniya nositelya yazyka v situacii lingvisticheskogo eksperimenta. V kn. etnokul`turnaya specifika yazykovogo soznaniya, M.: Institut yazykoznaniya RAN, s. 67-96.
KOROL'KOVA, A.V. (2005). Russkaya aforistika v kontekste frazeologii: avtoreferat dissertatsii doktora filologicheskikh nauk. Smolensk.
NALICHNIKOVA, I.A. (2009). Osobennosti leksiko-semanticheskogo urovnya yazy`kovoj lichnosti aforista (na primere G.K. Lixnenberga). Izvestiya Samarskogo nauchnogo centra Rossijskoj Akademii nauk, 4-5, s. 1283–1287.
NALICHNIKOVA, I.A. (2010). Kognitivno-pragmaticheskie osobennosti aforisticheskogo diskursa: avtoreferat dis. ... kandidata filologicheskix nauk. Ufa.
NEROZNAK, V.P. (1996). Lingvisticheskaya personologiya: k opredeleniyu statusa discipliny. V kn.: Yazy`k. Poe`tika. Perevod. Sbornik nauchnyx trudov. Moskva, 1996, s. 112-116.
NIKITINA, S.E. (1989). Yazykovoe soznanie i samosoznanie lichnosti v narodnoj kul`ture. V kn.: Yazyk i lichnost`. Moskva: Nauka.
OL`SHANSKIJ, I.G., MEL`NIKOVA O.V. (2009). Aforistika kak obyekt filologicheskix issledovanij // Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo lingvisticheskogo universiteta, 559, s. 63–81.
PETKAU, A. YU. (2014) Koncept «Zdorovye» kak kul`turnyj fenomen. Na materiale russkogo paremiologicheskogo fonda// Filologiya. 1 (124), s. 192–201.
PROXOROV, YU.E., STERNIN, I.A. (2011). Russkie: kommunikativnoe povedenie. Moskva: Flinta; Nauka.
RUSSKIY ASSOTSIATIVNYY SLOVAR’ (1998). Moskva. (Assotsiativnyy tezaurus sovremennogo russkogo yazyka. Chast' III. Kniga 5. Pryamoy slovar': ot stimula k reaktsii, 204 s.
RUSSKIJ ASSOCIATIVNYJ SLOVAR`. (1996). Kniga 2. Obratnyj slovar`: ot reakcii k stimulu. Associativnyj tezaurus sovremennogo russkogo yazyka. Chast` II./ Yu. N. Karaulov, Yu. A. Sorokin, E. F. Tarasov, N.V. Ufimceva, G.A. Cherkasova. Moskva, Institut russkogo yazyka RAN.
SEDYX, A.P. (2004). Yazykovaya lichnost` i etnos (nacional`no-kul`turny`e osobennosti kommunikativnogo povedeniya russkix i franczuzov). Moskva: Kompaniya Sputnik+.
SHEJNOV, V.P. (2014) Assertivnoe povedenie: preimushhestva i vospriyatie //Sovremennaya zarubezhnaya psixologiya, 2, s. 107–120.
STEPANOV, YU.S. (1997). Konstanty`. Slovar` russkoj kul`tury. Moskva: Yazyki russkoj kul`tury.
STERNIN, I.A. (2015). Modeli opisaniya kommunikativnogo povedeniya. Voronezh: Garant.
VORKACHEV, S.G. (2001). Lingvokul`turologiya, yazykovaya lichnost`, koncept: stanovlenie antropocentricheskoj paradigmy v yazykoznanii. Filologicheskie nauki. 2001, 1, s. 64-72.
VOROB`EV, V.V. (1997). Lingvokul`turologiya (teoriya i metody). Moskva: RUDN.
