WHAT DEMOCRACY WE HAVE? WHAT DEMOCRACY WE WANT?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30827/acfs.v46i0.488Keywords:
representative democracy, internet, social movements, direct democracy, citizen participationAbstract
The author begins by recognizing that the parameters on which were inscribed the institutions of representative democracy have changed substantially. In this new context places the debate on the possible def icits of representative democracy and specif ically the growing divestment popular capacity to influence and determine decisions, which makes losing legitimacy to a democracy that only keeps doors open formal rites and institutional. Second, the article focuses on what effect has the spread of internet in that scenario? The author notes how strategies of ICT so far developed in the political arena have focused on improving service delivery capacity or capacity expansion of consumer choice-citizens, but there is willingness to go beyond a conception of democracy that focuses on the procedural rules and in a very strict view of the principle of representation. Given these strategies, the article addresses, first, the relationship between the Internet, social movements and new forms of politics (focusing on the experience of 15M) and, on the other hand, the possibility of rethinking the old theme again direct democracy and citizen participation that extension and generalization of Internet allows. In both strategies late concern for the quality of participation and ability to engage people in collective matters both politically as a necessary not only to defend their interests, but as a way of understanding democracy, a democracy relational participatory.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors are the owners of the rights to their works. ACFS requests that publication notice on ACFS is disclosed if they appear later in another place.