Ontologías híbridas: materiales, culturas experimentales y género

Ana Romero de Pablos; María Jesús Santesmases

doi:10.30827/dynamis.v43i2.29440

Autores/as

Ana Romero de Pablos Instituto de Filosofía, CSIC https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5911-5887
María Jesús Santesmases Instituto de Filosofía, CSIC

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30827/dynamis.v43i2.29440

Resumen

Cuando en

Nunca fuimos modernos

Bruno Latour mostró el poco recorrido que tenía la polaridad clásica —el sujeto frente al objeto, lo social frente a lo natural— para pensar los distintos problemas que plantean las sociedades contemporáneas, puso sobre la mesados cuestiones claves que centraron su crítica a la modernidad. La primera tiene que ver con el ocultamiento que ese análisis polarizado hacía del carácter político y cultural que conlleva toda forma de conocer. Y la segunda con la incapacidad que estas dicotomías tienen para incorporar muchos objetos que, al convivir en ellos lo natural y lo cultural, son dif íciles de encajar. A estos objetos que Bruno Latour llamó híbridos está dedicado este monográfico.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

Bauer, Susanne; Martina Schlünder, Maria Rentetzi. Boxes: A Field Guide. Manchester: Mattering Press, 2020.

Bud, Robert. “Strategy in American cancer research after World War II: A case study”, Social Studies of Science 8, no .4 (1978): 425-459.

Bud, Robert, Deborah Warner, eds. Instruments of science: An historical encyclopedia.

Londres-Nueva York: Garland, 1998.

Cabré, Montserrat. “Women or healers? Household practices and the categories of health care in late medieval Iberia”. Bulletin of the History of Medicine (2008): 18-51.

Daston, Lorraine (ed.). Biographies of scientific objects. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000.

Daston, Lorraine. “On scientific observation.” Isis 99, no. 1 (2008): 97-110.

Duden, Barbara. Disembodying women: Perspectives on pregnancy and the unborn. Cam- bridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993.

Duden, Barbara. The woman beneath the skin: A doctor’s patients in eighteenth-century Germany. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1991.

Dupré, Sven; Christoph Herbert, ed. Silent messengers: the circulation of material objects of knowledge in the early modern Low Countries. Münster: LIT Verlag, 2011.

Edgerton, David. “From innovation to use: Ten eclectic theses on the historiography of technology.” History and Technology 16, no. 2 (1999): 111-136.

Gooding, David, Trevor Pinch, y Simon Schaffer, eds. The uses of experiment: Studies in the natural sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.

Hannan, Leonie y Sarah Longair. History through material culture. Manchester: Man- chester University Press, 2020.

Haraway, Donna. “Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective”. Feminist studies 14, no. 3 (1988): 575-599.

Hopwood, Nick, Rebecca Flemming, and Lauren Kassell, eds. Reproduction: Antiquity to the Present Day. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018.

Iliffe, Rob. “Technicians”, Notes & Records of Royal Society 62 (2008): 3-16.

Kohler, Robert E. Lords of the fly: Drosophila genetics and the experimental life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994.

Krige, John. “Hybrid knowledge: the transnational co-production of the gas centrifuge for uranium enrichment in the 1960s”. The British Journal for the History of Science 45, no. 3 (2012): 337-357.

Latour, Bruno. Nunca fuimos modernos. Trad. Víctor Goldstein. Madrid: Siglo XXI, 2022. Le Guin, Ursula K. “The carrier bag theory of fiction.” En Dancing at the Edge of the World: Thoughts on Words, Women, Places (New York: Grove Press), 1989, 165-170.

Lightman, Bernard, Gordon McOuat, Larry Stewart. The circulation of knowledge bet- ween Britain, India and China: The early-modern world to the twentieth century. Leiden: Brill, 2013.

López-Beltrán, Carlos y Vivette García Deister. “Aproximaciones científicas al mestizo mexicano.” Historia, ciencias, saude-manguinhos 20, no. 2 (2013): 391-410.

Łotysz, Sławomir. “Controlling the production and distribution of drugs in communist Poland.” Medicina nei Secoli: Arte e Scienza 26, no. 2 (2014): 519-56.

Lynch, Michael y Steve Woolgar. Representation in Scientific Practice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1990.

Mendel, Gregor. “Experiments in Plant Hybridisation.” Journal of the Royal Horticultural Society 26 (1901), part 1: 1-32. Translated by Charles T. Druery, with an introduc- tory note by W. Bateson from “Versuche Über Pflanzen-Hybriden”. Verhandlungen des naturforschenden Vereines zu Brünn 4 (1865): 3-47.

Müller-Wille, Staffan, and Christina Brandt, eds. Heredity explored: Between public domain and experimental science, 1850-1930. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2016.

Mol, Annemarie. The body multiple. Durham: Duke University Press, 2003. Olby, Robert Cecil. Origins of Mendelism. London: Constable, 1966.

Ortiz-Gómez, Teresa y María Jesús Santesmases, eds. Gendered drugs and medicine: historical and socio-cultural perspectives. Farham: Ashgate, 2014.

Pickstone, John V. Ways of Knowing: A new history of Science, Technology and Medicine. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000.

Phillips, Denise, and Sharon Kingsland, eds. New perspectives on the history of life sciences and agriculture. Springer, 2015.

Pimentel, Juan. Testigos del mundo: ciencia, literatura y viajes en la Ilustración. Madrid: Marcial Pons Historia, 2003.

Rego Robles, Miguel Ángel. “The early drawings and prints of Santiago Ramón y Cajal: a visual epistemology of the neurosciences”. European Journal of Anatomy 23 (2019): 57-66.

Rentetzi, Maria. Trafficking materials and gendered experimental practices: radium research in early 20th century Vienna. New York: Columbia University Press, 2008.

Rheinberger, Hans-Jörg. Toward a history of epistemic things: Synthesizing proteins in the test tube. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1997.

Rheinberger, Hans-Jörg. On historicizing epistemology: an essay. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2010.

Roberts, Lissa. “Situating science in global history: Local exchanges and networks of circulation”. Itinerario, 2009, 33 (1), pp. 9-30.

Roberts, Lissa; Simon Schaffer y Peter Dear, eds. The Mindful Hand. Inquiry and Invention from the Late Renaissance to Early Industrialisation. Amsterdam: Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen, 2007.

Romero de Pablos, Ana. “Pioneras pero invisibles: las calculistas del Laboratorio y Taller de Investigación del Estado Mayor de la Armada”. Clepsydra, 15 (2016): 49-62.

Romero de Pablos, Ana. “Mujeres científicas en la dictadura de Franco. Trayectorias investigadoras de Piedad de la Cierva y María Aránzazu Vigón”. Arenal 24, no 2 (2017): 319-348.

Romero de Pablos, Ana. “Prensa y tecnología en la España de Franco: del secreto a la política atómica pública”. Dynamis 38, no. 1 (2018):189-218.

Romero de Pablos, Ana. “Knowledge that travelled between Italy and Spain during the Franco regime: the construction of radioactivity counters”. História, Ciências, Saúde – Manguinhos 26, no. 1 (2019a): 265-279.

Romero de Pablos, Ana. Las primeras centrales nucleares españolas. Actores, políticas y tecnologías. Madrid: Sociedad Nuclear Española, 2019b. http://publicaciones.sne. es/Primeras-Centrales-Nucleares-Espanolas/

Santesmases, María Jesús. “Size and the centromere: translocations and visual cultures in early human genetics.” En Making mutations: Objects, practices, contexts, eds. Luis Campos y Alexander von Schwerin (Berlin: Instituto Max Planck de Historia de la Ciencia, 2010): 189-208.

Santesmases, María Jesús. “Screening antibiotics: industrial research by CEPA and Merck in the 1950s”. Dynamis 31, no. 2 (2011): 407-427.

Santesmases, María Jesús. “The Bacterial Cell Wall in the Antibiotic Era: An Ontology in Transit Between Morphology and Metabolism, 1940s-1960s”. Journal of the History of Biology, 49 (2016): 3-36.

Santesmases, María Jesús. “Discriminación in vitro: cuerpos y cariotipos en los orígenes de la genética del síndrome de Down”. En Justicia ¿para todos? (Madrid: Plaza y Valdés, 2016), 79-91.

Santesmases, María Jesús. “Circulating biomedical images: Bodies and chromosomes in the post-eugenic era”. History of Science 55, no. 4 (2017): 395-430.

Santesmases, María Jesús. The circulation of penicillin in Spain: health, wealth and authority. London: Palgrave, 2018.

Santesmases, María Jesús y Antonio Calvo Roy. Rosalind Franklin. Madrid: Prisa, 2019. Secord, James A. “Knowledge in transit”. Isis 95, no. 4 (2004): 654-672.

Schaffer, Simon; Lissa Roberts, Kapil Raj & James Delbourgo, eds. The brokered world: Go-betweens and global intelligence, 1770-1820. Sagamore Beach, Massachusetts: Science History Publications, 2009.

Shapin, Steven; Simon, Schaffer. Leviathan and the air-pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the experimental life. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1989.

Schiebinger, Londa L. ¿Tiene sexo la mente?: las mujeres en los orígenes de la ciencia moderna. Trad. María Cóndor, Madrid: Cátedra-Instituto de la Mujer, 2004.

Tansey, E.M. “Keeping the culture alive: The laboratory technician in mid-Twentieth-Cen- tury British medical research”. Notes & Records of Royal Society 62 (2008): 77-95.

Velasco Martín, Marta. “Moscas y redes: María Monclús y la genética de poblaciones en España”. Arenal. Revista de historia de las mujeres 24, no. 2 (2017): 349-378.

Velasco Martín, Marta. Genética de Drosophila y género: circulación de objetos y saberes. Tesis Doctoral, Universidad de Salamanca, 2019.

Wood, Roger J.; Vítězslav Orel. “Scientific breeding in Central Europe during the early nineteenth century: background to Mendel’s later work”. Journal of the History of Biology 38, no. 2 (2005): 239-272.