The ecocide-genocide nexus: for a ‘logics of destruction approach’ which definitely overcome liberal definitional legalism and its deceptive bearing on ecocide-genocide prevention
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30827/rec.9.33173Keywords:
Territory, Non-anthropologising perspective., Logics of destruction, Colonialism, Capitalist expansionAbstract
This article is an intervention in a growing scholarly literature and debate on ecocide, genocide and their nexus aimed as much at the teaching of these issues as at their study and research. The context for this debate is what the Permanent Peoples’ Tribunal (TPP) has aptly called ‘the most persistent war of our time, and the most difficult to win’: a war which ‘is being waged against nature and the “peoples of nature” by large corporations supported by states and the minority who run them’. The article argues that despite indisputable advances, yet the genocide-ecocide literature still suffers from the same grave flaws that have been at the basis of the disastrous failure of the genocide field (both scholarly and legal-institutional) to give absolute priority to genocide prevention. Many of those flaws lay in the reliance on a legalistic rationality to produce definitions of genocide. The article outlines a very different perspective which, contrary to liberal definitionalism, will be attentive to ecocidal-genocidal processes, logics and structures – a perspective that I name, in the wake of existing scholarship, ‘logics of destruction approach’. An examination of a few ongoing ecocides-genocides which exposes the common logics of destruction underpinning each case will show the workings of this perspective. The article concludes with a reflection on the question of justice, true justice, and how it interpellates us, scholars and teachers, and indeed everyone, now that ‘the most persistent war of our time, and the most difficult to win’ is at its peak and the planet and its denizens risk destruction and extinction.
References
Aiello, K. (2009). Peru’s ’Cold War’ Against Indigenous Peoples. CETRI. Le Sud en Mouvement, 31 juillet 2009. Available at https://www.cetri.be/Peru-s-Cold-War-Against-Indigenous?lang=fr.
Amnesty International (2017). Amnesty International Report 2016/17: The state of the world’s human rights. Available at https://www.amnesty.org/en/documents/pol10/4800/2017/en/.
Badiou, A. (2006). ‘Part Two: Uses of the Word “Jew”’, in Polemics, translated with an introduction by S. Corcoran. Verso, pp. 157-254 (originally published in French as Circonstances 3: Portées du mot “Juif”. Éditions Lignes & Manifestes, 2005).
Badiou, A. (2007). The Century, trans. with a commentary and notes by A. Toscano. Polity Press.
Beckman, M. (2013). The 43 Group: Battling Mosley’s Blackshirts. The History Press.
Blaser, M. (2013). ‘Notes towards a political ontology of “environmental” conflicts’. In Lesley Green (Ed.), Contested Ecologies: Dialogues in the South on Nature and Knowledge. HSRC Press, pp. 13–27.
Bloxham, D. and Moses, A.D. (Eds.) (2010). The Oxford Handbook of Genocide Studies. Oxford University Press.
Byrnes, A. and Simm, G. (2018). International Peoples’ Tribunals: Their Nature, Practice and Significance. In Byrnes and Simm (Eds.), pp. 11-41.
Byrnes, A. and Simm, G. (Eds.) (2018) Peoples’ Tribunals and International Law. Cambridge University Press.
Cáceres, B. (2020). Berta Cáceres in her own words. Interviews. Available at https://theviolenceofdevelopment.com/berta-caceres-in-her-own-words/.
Césaire, A. (2000 [1955]). Discourse on Colonialism. Translated by Joan Pinkham. Monthly Review Press.
COPINH (2021a). Juicio por el asesinato de Berta Cáceres: “Habrá culpables, pero no justicia”. 15 April 2021, available at https://berta.copinh.org/2021/04/juicio-por-el-asesinato-de-berta-caceres-habra-culpables-pero-no-justicia/.
COPINH (2021b). Liberation of territories is Justice for Berta. 17 May 2021, available at https://copinh.org/2021/05/liberation-of-territories-is-justice-for-berta/.
Dunlap, A. (2018). The ‘solution’ is now the ‘problem:’ wind energy, colonisation and the ‘genocide-ecocide nexus’ in the Isthmus of Tehuantepec, Oaxaca. The International Journal of Human Rights, 22(4), 550-573.
Dunlap, A. (2021) The Politics of Ecocide, Genocide and Megaprojects: Interrogating Natural Resource Extraction, Identity and the Normalization of Erasure. Journal of Genocide Research 23(2), 212–235.
Frade, C (2007). Gobernar a otros y gobernarse a sí mismo según la razón política liberal. Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas, 119(3), 35-63.
Global Witness (2016). New data on the murder rate of environmental and land activists in Honduras, the highest in the world. Available at https://www.globalwitness.org/en/press-releases/global-witness-releases-new-data-murder-rate-environmental-and-land-activists-honduras-highest-world/.
Global Witness (2024). Honduras: why urgent action is still needed in one of the deadliest places to defend the planet. Available at https://www.globalwitness.org/en/blog/honduras-why-urgent-action-still-needed-one-deadliest-places-defend-planet/.
Grain (2022). The Brazilian state and agri-food corporations are condemned for ecocide of the Cerrado and genocide of its peoples. Grain, 21 Dec 2022; https://grain.org/e/6935.
Hance, J. (2020). Cerrado: Brazil's tropical woodland, available at https://worldrainforests.com/cerrado/.
Higgins, P. (2012). Seed-Idea: Seeding Intrinsic Values: How a Law of Ecocide will Shift our Consciousness. Cadmus 1(5), 9–10.
Higgins, .P, Short, D. and South, N .(2013). Protecting the Planet: A Proposal for a Law of Ecocide. Crime, Law and Social Change, 59(3), 251–66.
Hilberg, R. (2020 [1980]). ‘The Significance of the Holocaust’. In Hilberg, The Anatomy of the Holocaust: selected works from a life of scholarship, edited by Walter H. Pehleand and René Schlot. Oxford Berghahn Books.
ISPN, Instituto Sociedade Populacao e Naturaleza (undated). Cerrado: The Heart of Brazil, available at https://ispn.org.br/biomas/cerrado/.
Jones, A. (2011 [2006]). Genocide: A Comprehensive Introduction. Routledge.
Kuper, L. (1981) Genocide: Its Political Use in the Twentieth Century. Yale University Press.
Kuper, L. (1994). ‘Theoretical issues relating to genocide: uses and abuses’. In G. Andreopoulos (Ed.), Genocide: Conceptual and Historical Dimensions. University of Pennsylvania Press (pp. 31-46).
Levene, M. (2004). A dissenting voice: or how current assumptions of deterring and preventing genocide may be looking at the problem through the wrong end of the telescope, Part I. Journal of Genocide Research, 6(2), 153-166.
Levene, M. (2010). ‘From Past to Future: Prospects for Genocide and its Avoidance in the Twenty-First Century’. In D. Bloxham and A. D. Moses (Eds.), pp. 638-659.
Linebaugh, P. and Rediker, M. (2012). The Many-Headed Hydra: The Hidden History of the Revolutionary Atlantic. Verso.
López Tarabochia, M. (2016). Baguazo: 10 cosas que debes saber antes de la sentencia por el conflicto ambiental más relevante en el Perú. Mongabay: Periodismo Ambiental Independiente en Latinoamerica, 22 September 2016. Available at https://es.mongabay.com/2016/09/baguazo-10-cosas-debes-saber-la-sentencia-los-acusados-conflicto-ambiental-mas-sonado-peru/.
Lupel, A. and Verdeja, E. (Eds.) (2013). Responding to Genocide: The Politics of International Action. Lynne Rienner.
Minkova, L. G. (2023) The Fifth International Crime: Reflections on the Definition of “Ecocide”. Journal of Genocide Research 25(1), 62-83.
Moses, A. D. (2002). Conceptual blockages and definitional dilemmas in the ‘racial century’: genocides of indigenous peoples and the Holocaust. Patterns of Prejudice 36(4), 7-36.
Moses, A. D. (2008). ‘Empire, colony, genocide: keywords and the philosophy of history’. In Moses (Ed.), pp. 3–54.
Moses, A. D. (Ed.) (2008) Empire, Colony, Genocide: Conquest, Occupation, and Subaltern Resistance in World History. Berghahn Books.
Mowforth, M. (2014). The Violence of Development: Resource Depletion, Environmental Crises and Human Rights Abuses in Central America. Pluto Press.
Peru Support Group (2024). Wampis and Awajún defend their territories against illegal mining. Available at https://perusupportgroup.org.uk/2024/02/wampis-and-awajun-defend-their-territories-against-illegal-mining/.
Petras, J. (2009). Peru: Blood Flows in the Amazon. Countercurrents, 17 June, 2009. Available at https://countercurrents.org/petras170609.htm.
PPT (2021-22). 49th Permanent Peoples’ Tribunal Session in Defence of the Cerrado Territories of Brazil; available at https://permanentpeoplestribunal.org/49-session-in-defense-of-the-cerrado-territories-2021-2022/?lang=en.
Robinson, D. (2022). Ecocide — Puzzles and Possibilities. Journal of International Criminal Justice 20(2), 313–347.
Rosenberg, S. P. (2012). Genocide Is a Process, Not an Event. Genocide Studies and Prevention 7(1), 16–23.
Roy, A. (2009). Listening to Grasshoppers: Field Notes on Democracy. Penguin.
Roy, A. (2011). Broken Republic: Three Essays. Penguin.
Semelin, J. (2007). Purify and Destroy: The Political Uses of Massacre and Genocide. Columbia University Press.
Shaw, M. (2015) What is Genocide? (2nd edition). Polity Press.
Short, D. (2016). Redefining Genocide: Settler Colonialism, Social Death and Ecocide. Zed books.
Stop Ecocide International (2021). Legal Definition of Ecocide: Proposed Amendments to the Rome Statute, available at https://www.stopecocide.earth/legal-definition-of-ecocide.
United Nations, Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Genocide Convention), available at https://www.un.org/en/genocideprevention/genocide-convention.shtml.
Vera, E. (2024). Illegal gold mining devastates Peruvian Amazon river and communities. Mongabay, 2 January 2024. Available at https://news.mongabay.com/2024/01/illegal-gold-mining-devastates-peruvian-amazon-river-and-communities/.
Verdeja, E. (2013). ‘Genocide: Debating Definitions’. In A. Lupel and E. Verdeja (Eds.), pp. 21-46.
Winter, C. (2006). ‘The Master-Signifier of the New Aryans’. In Badiou, pp. 217-229.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.