Tennis Doubles development: Two historical snapshots show enormous tactical changes at the professional level over 20 years

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30827/ijrss.34013

Keywords:

history and development, notational analysis, ATP doubles, Serve & Volley tactics

Abstract

We aimed to compare tactical characteristics in professional men´s tennis doubles by notational analysis of two historical samples of matches collected at least 20 years apart. Samples were taken either between 1985 and 1990 (D<1990: 57 matches, 9.305 points, 34.428 strokes) or in 2011 (D>2010: 8 matches, 1.002 points, 4.297 strokes) during official ATP tournaments. Players were internationally ATP Ranking (D<1990: 76 ± 89; D>2010: 102 ± 91) and all matches were played on clay courts following ITF rules. Notational analysis was done by tagging video recordings following the same self-programmed notation software model. Absolute and percentage numbers of stroke rates, winners, and errors as well as specific tactics for services (e. g. Serve & Volley), returns (e. g. Chip & Charge), volleys and groundstrokes (e. g. positioning) were analysed. Coding was done by two experienced tennis coaches. Interrater reliability was calculated by Cohen’s Kappa and items with r < 0.9 were excluded. Differences between D<1990 and D>2010 were calculated by independent t-tests. Significance level was set at p<0.05. Rally length (3.7±0.3 vs. 4.2±0.5 strokes per point, p<0.001) increased significantly from D<1990 to D>2010. The percentage of serves (32.5±3.9 vs. 23.8±3.5 %) and volleys (25.1±4.0 vs. 17.3±5.7 %) decreased while the percentage of groundstrokes increased over time (8.8±3.6 vs. 26.9±7.0 %) (p<0.001). Serve & Volley application was reduced to one third in D>2010 (98.7±2.0 % vs 33.9±33.4 %) with a high individual variation. Positioning of Returns (more often behind the baseline) and volleys (shorter distance to the net) changed in D>2010 (p<0.001). Tactical characteristics in men´s tennis doubles completely changed within a time frame of 20 years mainly attributed to a decreased Serve & Volley application from most but not from all double players. The current variability in technical and tactical demands must be considered by individualized coaching guidelines.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Katharina Raasch, Ruhr University Bochum

Faculty of Sport Science, Department for Training & Exercise Science, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.

Andreas Theile, Ruhr University Bochum

Faculty of Sport Science, Department for Training & Exercise Science, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.

Alexander Ferrauti, Ruhr University Bochum

Faculty of Sport Science, Department for Training & Exercise Science, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.

References

Association of Tennis Professionals [ATP]. (2024). ATP 2024 Tournaments. https://www.atptour.com/en/scores/current/halle/500/draws?matchtype=doubles

Black, W., & Van de Braam, M. (2012). The Modern Game of Doubles: A tactical perspective. ITF coaching & sport science review, 20(56), 18–21. https://doi.org/10.52383/itfcoaching.v20i56.403 DOI: https://doi.org/10.52383/itfcoaching.v20i56.403

Borderias, M., Iglesias, X., Martínez-Gallego, R., & Baiget, E. (2024). Comparison of the finishing shot and ending zone of points in Grand Slam matches of women's doubles tennis: A cross-sectional study. PloS one, 19(5), e0303437. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0303437 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0303437

Carboch, J., & Kocib, T. (2015). A comparison of service efficiency between players of male and female doubles at professional tennis tournaments. Acta kinanthropologica, 51(2), 56-62. https://doi.org/10.14712/23366052.2015.32 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14712/23366052.2015.32

Carboch, J., Kocib, T., & Pechacova, M. (2014). Analysis of tactical variants in men’s and women’s tennis doubles on the international level. Asian journal of science and technology, 5(3), 204-207.

Cohen, J. (1968). Weighted kappa: nominal scale agreement provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. Psychological bulletin, 70(4), 213-220. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0026256

Fernandez-Fernandez, J., Kinner, V., & Ferrauti, A. (2010). The physiological demands of hitting and running in tennis on different surfaces. Journal of strength and conditioning research, 24(12), 3255-3264. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181e8745f DOI: https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181e8745f

Ferrauti, A. (1992). Tennis-Doppel und Spielerbeobachtung. Czwalina: Ahrensburg bei Hamburg.

GraphPad (2024). T test calculator. https://www.graphpad.com/quickcalcs/ttest2/.

International Tennis Federation [ITF]. (2024). ITF world tour men’s calendar. https://www.itftennis.com/en/tournament-calendar/mens-world-tennis-tour-calendar/?categories=All&startdate=2024-06

Kocib, T., Carboch, J., Cabela, M., & Kresta, J. (2020). Tactics in tennis doubles: analysis of the formations used by the serving and receiving teams. International journal of physical education, fitness and sports, 9(2), 45-50. https://doi.org/ 10.34256/ijpefs2026 DOI: https://doi.org/10.34256/ijpefs2026

Lausic, D., Tennebaum, G., Eccles, D., Jeong, A., & Johnson, T. (2009). Intrateam communication and performance in doubles tennis. Research quarterly for exercise and sport, 80(2), 281-290. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2009.10599563 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2009.10599563

Martinez-Gallego, R., Crespo, M., Ramón-Llin, J., Micó, S., & Guzmán, J. F. (2020). Men’s doubles professional tennis on hard courts: Game structure and point ending characteristics. Journal of human sport and exercise, 15(3), 633-642. https://doi.org/10.14198/jhse.2020.153.13 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14198/jhse.2020.153.13

Martinez-Gallego, R., Ramón-Llin, J., & Crespo, M. (2021a). A cluster analysis approach to profile men and women’s volley positions in professional tennis matches (Doubles). Sustainability, 13, 6370. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116370 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116370

Martinez-Gallego, R., Vives, F., Guzmán, J. F., Ramón-Llin, J., & Crespo, M. (2021b). Time structure in men’s professional doubles tennis: does team experience allow finishing the points faster? International journal of performance analysis in sport, 21(2), 215-225. https://doi.org/10.1080/24748668.2021.1872218 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/24748668.2021.1872218

Martinez-Gallego, R., Crespo, M., & Jiménez, J. (2021c). Analysis of the differences in serve effectiveness between Billie Jean King Cup (former Fed Cup) and Davis Cup doubles tennis matches. International journal of sports science & coaching, 16(3), 777-783. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747954120988545 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1747954120988545

Pollard, G., & Pollard, G. (2010). The efficiency of tennis doubles scoring systems. Journal of sports science & medicine, 9(3), 393-397.

Roetert, P. & Groppel, J. (2001). World-Class Tennis Technique. Human Kinetics.

Schmidhofer, S., Leser, R., & Ebert, M. (2014). A comparison between the structure in elite tennis and kids’ tennis on scaled courts (Tennis 10s). International journal of performance analysis in sport, 14(3), 829-840. https://doi.org/10.1080/24748668.2014.11868761 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/24748668.2014.11868761

Published

2025-05-30

How to Cite

Raasch, K., Theile, A., & Ferrauti, A. (2025). Tennis Doubles development: Two historical snapshots show enormous tactical changes at the professional level over 20 years. International Journal of Racket Sports Science, 7(1), 12–20. https://doi.org/10.30827/ijrss.34013