Speed and spin differences between the old celluloid versus new plastic table tennis balls and the effect on the kinematic responses of elite versus sub-elite players

Authors

Keywords:

table tennis, rule change, kinematics

Abstract

This study measured 1) the speed and spin differences between the old celluloid versus new plastic table tennis balls at pre ball-table impact and post ball-table impact when projected with topspin at 7.56 m.s-1, and investigated 2) the effect this has on the kinematic responses of 5 elite versus 5 sub-elite players’ forehand topspin in response to topspin and backspin. Plastic balls were lower in both speed and spin at pre and post ball-table impact compared with celluloid balls but the magnitude of change in speed and spin for each ball material differed. During flight before impact plastic balls lost 3.98% more speed and 1.24% more spin than celluloid balls. Post ball-table impact, plastic balls showed a greater speed increment (0.69%) and smaller spin decrement (0.19%) than celluloid balls. Differences in players’ kinematic responses to the different ball materials were found only when players returned backspin shots. Players supinated their rackets more by 2.23% at ball-racket contact and produced 3.37% less ball spin when returning plastic compared with celluloid balls; an indication of an early adaptation to the lower spin rate of plastic balls. The lack of differences in kinematic response to topspin may be due to the similar changes in speed and spin of both types of ball at ball-table impact. It is not known if a higher initial ball projection velocity would evoke differences in movement responses from the players post ball-table impact but could be explored in future studies.

Author Biographies

Marcus J. C. Lee, Singapore Sport Institute

Singapore Sport Institute

Hiroki Ozaki, Singapore Sport Institute

Singapore Sport Institute, Singapore. Japan Institute of Sports Sciences, Japan.

Wan Xiu Goh, Singapore Sport Institute

Singapore Sport Institute.

References

Cohen J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. New York, NY: Routledge Academic Hodges, L. (1993). Table tennis: Step to success. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

Iino, Y., & Kojima, T. (2009). Kinematics of table tennis topspin forehands: effects of performance level and ball spin. Journal of Sports Sciences, 27(12), 1311-1321.

Iino, Y., Mori, T., & Kojima, T. (2008). Contributions of upper limb rotations to racket velocity in table tennis backhands against topspin and backspin. Journal of Sports Sciences, 26(3), 287-293.

Inaba, Y., Tamaki, S., Ikebukuro, H., Yamada, K., Ozaki H., & Yoshida, K. (2017). Effect of changing table tennis ball material from celluloid to plastic on the post-collision ball trajectory. Journal of Human Kinetics, 55, 29-38.

Iimoto, Y., Yoshida, K., & Yuza, N. (2002). Rebound characteristics of the new table tennis ball. Differences between the 40 mm (2.7 g) and 38 mm (2.5 g) balls. Table Tennis Sciences, 4&5, 233-243.

International Table Tennis Federation. (2014, April 08). ITTF Goes Plastic for Future Events [Press release]. International Table Tennis Federation. Retrieved December 2, 2016, from http://www.old.ittf.com/press_releases/PR/PR1.asp?id=10

Küneth, T. (2017). The new plastic balls; questions and answers. Unpulished paper. Equipment Committee, International Table Tennis Federation.

Meyer, D., & Tiefenbacher, K. (2012). Comparison of plastic (“poly”) and celluloid balls; evaluation of difference for rebound on racket and player perception. Unpublished report. Equipment Committee, International Table Tennis Federation.

Nagurka, M. (2003). Aerodynamic effects in a dropped ping-pong ball experiment. International Journal of Engineering Education, 19 (4), 623-630.

Takeuchi, T., Kobayashi, Y., Hiruta, S., & Yuza, N. (2002). The effect of the 40mm diameter ball on table tennis rallies by elite players. International Journal of Table Tennis Sciences, 4&5, 265-277.

Tang, H. P., Mizoguchi, M., & Toyoshima, S. (2001). Speed and spin characteristics of the 40mm table tennis ball. Table Tennis Sciences, 4&5, 278-284.

Yoshida, K., Yamada, K., Tamaki, S., Naito, H., & Kaga, M. (2014). The rotation speed of the service ball delivered by world-class table tennis players. Japan Soc Phys Educ Health Sport Sci, 59(1), 227-236

Zhang, H., & Hohmann, A. (2004). Table tennis after the introduction of the 40 mm ball and the 11 point format. In A. Lees, J. F. Kahn, & I. W. Maynard (Eds.), Science and racket sports III (pp. 227–232). London: Routledge.

Downloads

Published

2025-02-27

How to Cite

Lee, M. J. C., Ozaki, H., & Goh, W. X. (2025). Speed and spin differences between the old celluloid versus new plastic table tennis balls and the effect on the kinematic responses of elite versus sub-elite players. International Journal of Racket Sports Science, 1(1), 26–36. Retrieved from https://revistaseug.ugr.es/index.php/IJRSS/article/view/32956