Co-constructing Good Practices: social work with unaccompanied minors in Italy

Maddalena Floriana Grassi; Giuseppa Ferraro; Silvana Mordeglia

doi:10.30827/tsg-gsw.33425

Autores/as

Maddalena Floriana Grassi Fondazione Nazionale degli Assistenti Sociali; Università degli Studi di Bari Aldo Moro https://orcid.org/0009-0004-5235-4596
Giuseppa Ferraro Fondazione Nazionale degli Assistenti Sociali https://orcid.org/0009-0006-3471-0459
Silvana Mordeglia Fondazione Nazionale degli Assistenti Sociali https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6729-7107

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30827/tsg-gsw.33425

Palabras clave:

Unaccompanied Minors, Transition to Adulthood, Good Practice, Social Inclusion, Collaborative Research, Italy, Social Work

Agencias: This publication has been prepared within the framework of the European Project “Global-ANSWER: Global social work and human mobility: comparative studies on local government and good social work practices in the euro-mediterranean region (2020-2025)” and reflects only the authors’ opinion. This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement No. 872209.The Agency and the European Commission are not responsible for any use that may be made of the information contained herein.

Resumen

Introduction. The reception and integration of Unaccompanied and Separated Children (UASC) in migration context across Europe require not only adequate legislative and service frameworks, but also effective and reflective social work practices. Within the framework of the European Project Global-ANSWER Project, this Italian case study examines what constitutes “good practice” in social work with UASC, drawing on a shared theoretical model developed by the project’s transnational network. The study focuses on four core analytical dimensions: continuity; decolonisation; circularity; prevention, exploring how these intersect with practice and policy in the Italian context. Methods. The research adopts a collaborative methodology, combining qualitative narrative interviews (n = 14) with social workers and recently adult former UASC, alongside additional documentary and policy analysis. Interviews were thematically analysed using Atlas.ti, based on the dimensions of good practice co-developed within the network by scholars and practitioners. The approach aimed to co-construct knowledge by integrating professional expertise with lived experience. Results. The findings indicate that “continuity” in social work emerges when practices are embedded in inter-institutional networks and aligned with local service systems, thereby ensuring equal access and continuity of support. “Decolonisation” is reflected in the adoption of rights-based, non-ethnocentric, approaches that foster intercultural communication and recognise the diverse experiences of UASC. “Circularity” is evident in practices that enable professionals to integrate personal, theoretical and policy dimensions through supervision, shared reflection, and responsiveness to individual trajectories. Finally, “prevention” is demonstrated in practices that link reception and care to long-term community integration, promoting autonomy beyond institutional support. Discussion and conclusions. Collectively, these four dimensions provide a conceptual and operational framework for evaluating and strengthening social work practices with UASC. They support a vision of social work as both a relational and systemic endeavour, capable of promoting structural inclusion through co-designed, context-sensitive interventions. By focusing on the intersection of practice, policy and lived experience, this study offers valuable insights into what constitutes good practice in social work with UASC. It highlights the importance of a continuous, decolonised, and prevention-oriented practice, developed in circular dialogue with theory, as essential for inclusive and effective social work with young migrants.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Biografía del autor/a

Maddalena Floriana Grassi, Fondazione Nazionale degli Assistenti Sociali; Università degli Studi di Bari Aldo Moro

Ph.D., Research Fellow in General Sociology. Adjunct Professor of Social Services Planning and Management. Department of Political Science, University of Bari Aldo Moro.

Giuseppa Ferraro, Fondazione Nazionale degli Assistenti Sociali

Specialist social worker, sociologist with a focus on criminology, and Doctor of Law. She is enrolled in the Master's Degree program at Roma Tre University for Social Worker Supervision. Her areas of interest in practice and research is Immigration and Migrant Reception, gender-based violence against women and minors, discrimination in the workplace, Ethics and Professional Conduct of Social Workers. She is the Vice President of the Natonal Disciplinary Council of the National Associaton of Social Workers and a collaborator with the Natonal Social Worker Foundaton.

Silvana Mordeglia, Fondazione Nazionale degli Assistenti Sociali

Ph.D., Adjunct Professor of Social Service Methods and Techniques and Social Planning. Department of Law, University of Genoa.

Citas

Allegri, E. (2015). Il servizio sociale di comunità. Carocci.

Allegri, E. (2023). Supervisione e servizio sociale. Carocci.

Ambrosini, M. (2008). Un’altra globalizzazione. La sfida delle migrazioni transnazionali. Il Mulino.

Arcidiacono, C., Gelli, B., & Putton, A. (Eds.). (1996). Empowerment sociale. Franco Angeli.

Barnes, M. (1999). Utenti, carer e cittadinanza attiva. Politiche sociali oltre il welfare state. Erickson.

Bergold, J., & Thomas, S. (2012). Participatory research methods: A methodological approach in motion. Historical Social Research, 37(4), 191-222. https://doi.org/10.12759/hsr.37.2012.4.191-222

Campanini, A. (2015). Il servizio sociale e le policy practices. In A. Bassi, & G. Moro (Eds.), Politiche sociali innovative e diritti di cittadinanza (pp. 101-120). Il Mulino.

Cassano, F. (1989). Approssimazione. Esercizi di esperienza dell'altro. Il Mulino.

Coghlan, D., & Brydon-Miller, M. (2014). Collaborative action research. In D. Coghlan, & M. Brydon-Miller (Eds.), The SAGE encyclopedia of action research (Vol. 2, pp. 117-119). SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446294406.n57 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446294406

Cohen-Emerique, M. (2017). Per un approccio interculturale nelle professioni sociali e educative. Erickson.

Cornwall, A., & Jewkes, R. (1995). What is participatory research? Social Science & Medicine, 41(12), 1667-1676. https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(95)00127-S DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(95)00127-S

D’Cruz, H., Gillingham, P., & Melendez, S. (2007). Reflexivity, its meanings and relevance for social work: A critical review of the literature. British Journal of Social Work, 37(1), 73-90. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcl001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcl001

De Ambrogio, U. (1999). L’analisi della qualità percepita nei servizi sociali. Principi e metodologie di valutazione. NIS.

Di Rosa, R.T. (2022). Integrazione dei migranti. In A. Campanini (Ed.), Nuovo dizionario di servizio sociale (pp. 305-308). Carocci. https://hdl.handle.net/10447/578892

Di Rosa, R.T. (2023). Richiedenti asilo tra vulnerabilità e resilienza. Una ricerca internazionale. In S. Greco, & G. Tumminelli (Eds.), Migrazioni in Sicilia (pp. 158–162). Mimesis. https://hdl.handle.net/10447/605213

Di Rosa, R.T., & Tuminelli, G. (2024). Empowering migrant inclusion. Professional skills and tools. Springer Series. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-55501-5

Dominelli, L. (2005). Il servizio sociale. Una professione che cambia. Erickson.

Dominelli, L., & Macleod, E. (1999). Trabajo social feminista. Cátedra.

Faccioli, F., D’Ambrosi, L., & Massoli, L. (Eds.). (2007). Voci della ribalta. Comunicazione sociale, processi inclusivi e partecipazione. Edizioni Scientifiche Italiane.

Favarò, V., & Marcenò, S. (2020). Rethinking borders. Decolonizing knowledge and categories. Palermo University Press.

Franzoni, F., & Anconelli, M. (2021). La rete dei servizi alla persona. Carocci.

Gal, J., & Weiss-Gal, I. (2013). Policy practice in social work: An introduction. In J. Gal, & I. Weiss-Gal (Eds.), Social worker affecting social policy: An international perspective (pp. 1-16). Policy Press. https://doi.org/10.1332/policypress/9781847429735.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1332/policypress/9781847429735.003.0001

Garrett, P. M. (2024). What are We Talking about When We are Talking about ‘Decolonising’ Social Work? British Journal of Social Work, 54(5), 2027-2044. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcae018 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcae018

George, E.S., & Pignaris, L.C. (Eds.). (2020). Coltivare partecipazione. La Meridiana.

Giarelli, G. (2002). Oltre la “customer satisfaction”: il problema di cogliere la complessità di un punto di vista. In L. Altieri, C. Cipolla, & G. Giarelli (Eds.), Valutare la qualità in sanità (pp. 127-160). Franco Angeli.

Gijón, M.T., Gucciardo, G., & Quesada Herrera, E. (2023). Good practice in the field of social work human mobility for the Global-ANSWER Network. In R.T. Di Rosa, M.T. Gijón, & G. Gucciardo (Coords.), Guide on conceptual and methodological issues in social work research in the field of human mobility (pp.85-92). Global-ANSWER Network “Social Work and Human Mobility”.

Giovannetti, M., & Accorinti, M. (2022). Le professionalità sociali coinvolte nel sistema di accoglienza per minori stranieri non accompagnati: un terreno da esplorare e coltivare. Studi Emigrazione, (225), 41-62.

Gui, L. (Ed.). (2018). Altervisione. Un metodo di costruzione condivisa del sapere professionale nel servizio sociale. Franco Angeli.

Jabbar, A. (2002). Percorsi migratori: inserimento, marginalità e ruolo del servizio sociale. In A. Campanini (Ed.), Il servizio sociale in una società multietnica (pp.151-157). Unicopli.

Kabeer, N. (1998). Realidades trastocadas. Las jerarquías de género en el pensamiento del desarrollo. Paidós.

Keller, J.D., & Lehman, F.K. (1991). Complex concepts. Cognitive Science, 15(2), 271-291. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1502_4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0364-0213(91)80008-S

Lacomba, J. (2020). Una revisión del trabajo social con migrantes y refugiados. Construyendo nuevas bases teóricas y metodológicas. Ehquidad, (14), 293-332. https://doi.org/10.15257/ehquidad.2020.0020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15257/ehquidad.2020.0020

Lipsky, M. (2023). The critical role of street level bureaucrats. In V.E. Cree, & T. McCulloch (Eds.), Social work: A reader (2nd ed.). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003178699-38

Martín-Estalayo, M. (2023). Consciencia y conciencia para la agenda 2023 del trabajo social. Cuadernos de Trabajo Social, 36(1), 1-2. https://doi.org/10.5209/cuts.86207 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5209/cuts.86207

Ministero del Lavoro e delle Politiche Sociali. (2024). Rapporto di approfondimento semestrale sulla presenza dei Minori Stranieri Non Accompagnati (MSNA) in Italia. Ministero del Lavoro e delle Politiche Sociali. https://www.integrazionemigranti.gov.it/AnteprimaPDF.aspx?id=7652

Moro, G. (1998). Manuale alla cittadinanza attiva. Carocci.

Newbigging, K., & Thomas, N. (2010). Good practice in social care for asylum seekers and refugees. Social Care Institute for Excellence.

Øyen, E. (2002). A methodological approach to “best practices”. https://hdl.handle.net/1956/2429

Parlamento Italiano. Decreto legislativo 25 Iuglio 1998, n.286, Testo unico delle disposizioni concernenti la disciplina dell'immigrazione e norme sulla condizione dello straniero. Gazzetta Ufficiale della Repubblica Italiana, 191, 18 Agosto 1998. https://www.gazzettaufficiale.it/eli/id/1998/08/18/098G0348/sg

Parlamento Italiano. Decreto legislativo 18 agosto 2015, n.142, Attuazione della direttiva 2013/33/UE recante norme relative all'accoglienza dei richiedenti protezione internazionale, nonché della direttiva 2013/32/UE, recante procedure comuni ai fini del riconoscimento e della revoca dello status di protezione internazionale. Gazzetta Ufficiale della Repubblica Italiana, 214, del 15 settembre 2015. https://www.gazzettaufficiale.it/eli/id/2015/09/15/15G00158/sg

Parlamento Italiano. Legge 7 aprile 2017, n. 47, Disposizioni in materia di misure di protezione dei minori stranieri non accompagnati. Gazzetta Ufficiale della Repubblica Italiana, 93, 21 aprile 2017. https://www.gazzettaufficiale.it/eli/id/2017/04/21/17G00062/s

Popescu, M., & Libal, K. (2018). Social work with migrants and refugees: Challenges, best practices, and future directions. Advances in Social Work, 18(3), i-x. https://doi.org/10.18060/22600 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18060/22600

Raya, E., & López Peláez, A. (2017). Social work research: Innovating to respond to the challenges of a complex world. In E. Raya, & A. López Peláez (Eds.), Social work research and practice. Contributing to a science of social work (pp. 21-32). Thomson Reuters Aranzadi.

Ripamonti, E. (2018). Collaborare. Metodi partecipativi per il sociale. Carocci.

Rowe, S., Baldry, E., & Earles, W. (2015). Decolonising Social Work Research: Learning from Critical Indigenous Approaches. Australian Social Work, 68(3), 296-308. https://doi.org/10.1080/0312407X.2015.1024264 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0312407X.2015.1024264

Sarri, R., & Sarri, C. (1993). Organizational and community change through participatory action research. Administration in Social Work, 16(3-4), 99-122. https://doi.org/10.1300/J147v16n03_07 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1300/J147v16n03_07

Sciortino, G. (2015). È possibile misurare l’integrazione degli immigrati? Lo stato dell’arte (Quaderni del Dipartimento di Sociologia e Ricerca Sociale, n. 63). University of Trento, Department of Sociology and Social Research.

Schön, D.A. (1993). Il professionista riflessivo. Per una nuova epistemologia della pratica professionale. Edizioni Dedalo.

Sicora, A. (2021). Emozioni nel servizio sociale. Carocci.

Spinelli, E. (2020). Servizio sociale e (im)migrazione. In A. Campanini (Ed.), Nuovo dizionario di servizio sociale (pp. 613-616). Carocci.

Tarsia, T. (2023). Praticare la ricerca collaborativa. La produzione di conoscenza nel lavoro sociale. Carocci.

Tomei, G. (2004). Valutazione partecipata della qualità. Il cittadino-utente nel giudizio sugli interventi di politica e servizio sociale. Franco Angeli.

Weiss-Gal, I. (2017). What option do we have? Exploring routes for social workers’ policy engagement. Journal of Policy Practice, 16(3), 247-260. https://doi.org/10.1080/15588742.2016.1234955 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15588742.2016.1234955