Vision Theory vs. Goal-Setting Theory: A Critical Analysis

Authors

  • Ali H. Al-Hoorie English Language and Preparatory Year Institute. Royal Commission for Jubail and Yanbu, Saudi Arabia Author
  • Ahmed Al Shlowiy English Language and Preparatory Year Institute. Royal Commission for Jubail and Yanbu, Saudi Arabia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30827/portalin.vi33.26656

Keywords:

language motivation, second language acquisition, vision, goal

Abstract

In recent years, vision has become a major theme in language motivation research, capturing a core feature of modern theories of language motivation. However, empirical investigations have mostly followed the prototypical design of administering self-report questionnaires and examining correlations among a handful of variables. At the same time, substantial overlap can be found between the current conceptualization of vision theory and the long-standing tradition of goal-setting theory. After demonstrating this substantial overlap, and taking our cues from goal-setting theory, this paper highlights critical gaps in current research into vision, including its sensory element, characteristics of effective vision,vision evolution over time, vision multiplicity and potential inter-vision conflict, visionmediators,collective vision, and the role of emotions and self-satisfaction at the end. The ultimate aimof this article is to propose a research agenda to examine the extent to which vision can bemeaningfully distinguished from goal.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2020-01-31

Issue

Section

Article

How to Cite

Vision Theory vs. Goal-Setting Theory: A Critical Analysis. (2020). Porta Linguarum. An International Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Learning, 33, 217-229. https://doi.org/10.30827/portalin.vi33.26656