Second language pragmatic competence in digitally mediated communication: Exploring requests and refusals
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30827/portalin.vi45.33005Keywords:
pragmatic competence, requests, refusals, digitally mediated communication, English as a Foreign LanguageAbstract
The present study investigates second language (L2) pragmatic strategies of requests and refusals used by English as a Foreign Language (EFL) students in digitally mediated communication (DMC). It is a cross-sectional study that employed a mixed-method approach. The participants were 93 first-year undergraduate students enrolled in the Translation and Interpretation degree at a public university in Spain. They completed an online questionnaire which included background questions and a discourse completion task (DCT) that featured request and refusal scenarios with varying degrees of imposition, power, and social distance in emails and WhatsApp messages in an academic context. Speech act production was evaluated based on appropriateness rate and types of speech act strategies employed. Aspects such as formality, politeness, directness, as well as structure and content used were considered. The statistical analysis was complemented with a qualitative analysis of the speech act strategies used by the participants. Findings revealed that sociopragmatic factors – namely, social distance, power and imposition – determined the students’ ability to craft appropriate emails and WhatsApp messages. Furthermore, significant differences were found in the production of requests, whereas refusals were more challenging for the participants. These results underscore the importance of acquiring EFL pragmatics withing the DMC context.Downloads
References
Biesenbach-Lucas, S. (2007). Students writing emails to faculty: An examination of e-politeness among native and non-native speakers of English. Language Learning & Technology, 11(2), 59–81. http://dx.doi.org/10125/44104
Bou-Franch, P. (2013). EFL email writing: A focus on pragmatic transfer. In N. Estevez & B. Clavel (Eds.), La adquisición de una segunda lengua en el nuevo espacio europeo de educación superior (pp. 39–55). Universitat de València.
Brown, L. S., & Lewis, K. (2022). The elementary forms of digital communication. PLOS ONE, 17(9), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0273726
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge university press. http://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813085
Chang, Y.F. (2009). How to say no: An analysis of cross-cultural difference and pragmatic transfer. Language Sciences, 31(4), 477–493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2008.01.002
Chejnová, P. (2014). Expressing politeness in the institutional e-mail communications of university students in the Czech Republic. Journal of Pragmatics, 60, 175–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.10.003
Chen, Y. (2009). A cognitive linguistic approach to classroom English vocabulary instruction for EFL learners in Mainland China. English Language Teaching, 2(1), 95–100. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v2n1p95
Chen, Y. (2015). Developing Chinese EFL learners’ email literacy through requests to faculty. Journal of Pragmatics, 75, 131–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.05.009
Codina-Espurz, V., & Salazar-Campillo, P. (2019). Student-to-faculty email consultation in English, Spanish and Catalan in an academic context. In Investigating the learning of pragmatics across ages and contexts (pp. 196-217). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004409699_010
Economidou-Kogetsidis, M. (2011). “Please answer me as soon as possible”: Pragmatic failure in non-native speakers’ e-mail requests to faculty. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(13), 3193–3215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.06.006
Eslami, Z. R., & Ko, W. H. (2015). Facework in non-face-threatening emails by native and non-native English speakers. Russian Journal of Linguistics, 1(4), 111-126.
Farhang-Ju, M. (2020). A window to L2 learners' requests to faculty in instant text-based communication. Computer-Assisted Language Learning Electronic Journal, 21(1), 29-41.
Farrokhi, F., & Atashian, S. (2012). The role of refusal instruction in pragmatic development. World Journal of Education, 2(4), 85–93. https://doi.org/10.5430/wje.v2n4p85
Félix-Brasdefer, J. C. (2010). Data collection methods in speech act performance. Speech act performance: Theoretical, empirical and methodological issues, 26, 41–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/lllt.26.03fel
Flores-Salgado, E., & Castineira-Benitez, T. A. (2018). The use of politeness in WhatsApp discourse and move ‘requests.’ Journal of Pragmatics, 133, 79–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.06.009
González-Lloret, M. & Ortega, L. (2018). Chapter 8. Pragmatics, tasks, and technology: A synergy. In N. Taguchi & Y. Kim (Ed.), Task-Based Approaches to Teaching and Assessing Pragmatics (pp. 191-214). John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.10.08gon
Ishihara, N., & Cohen, A.D. (2010). Teaching and Learning Pragmatics: Where Language and Culture Meet (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315833842
Lazarescu, R. C. (2020). L2 Pragmatics in an English-Medium University Setting: Examining the production and perception of requests in Business students’ email writing [Doctoral dissertation, Complutense University of Madrid]. Complutense University of Madrid Research Repository Docta. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/5535
Lee, H. (2013). The influence of social situations on fluency difficulty in Korean EFL learners’ oral refusals. Journal of Pragmatics, 50(1), 168-186. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.01.002
Malabarba, T. (2022). Requesting on WhatsApp: The interplay of interactional competence and deontics in English as an additional language. TESOL in Context, 30(2), 35-62. https://doi.org/10.21153/tesol2022vol30no2art1516
Mao, T., & He, S. (2021). An integrated approach to pragmatic competence: Its framework and properties. Sage Open, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211011472
Sánchez-Hernández, A. (2018). A mixed-methods study of the impact of sociocultural adaptation on the development of pragmatic production. System, 75, 93-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2018.03.008
Satıç, C. Ö., & Çiftçi, H. (2018). Refusal strategies and perceptions of social factors for refusing: Empirical insights from Turkish learners of English. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 14(1), 11-27.
Shishavan, H. B., & Sharifian, F. (2016). The refusal speech act in a cross-cultural perspective: A study of Iranian English-language learners and Anglo-Australian speakers. Language & Communication, 47, 75–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2016.01.001
Taguchi, N. (2011). Teaching pragmatics: Trends and issues. Annual review of applied linguistics, 31, 289-310. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0267190511000018
Taguchi, N. (Ed.). (2019). The Routledge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition and Pragmatics (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351164085
Vrocharidou, A., & Efthymiou, I. (2012a). Computer Mediated Communication for social and academic purposes: Profiles of use and university students’ gratifications. Computers & Education, 58(1), 609–616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.09.015
Wang, Y. J. (2018). A comparative study on Taiwan EFL college students and native English speakers in composing English request refusal emails. Chaoyang Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 16, 47-62.
Zheng, Q., & Xu, Y. (2019). ‘I will not put this request at the very beginning’: Chinese EFL students' perception of pragmatic (in) felicity in English email requests. East Asian Pragmatics, 4(1), 37–58. https://doi.org/10.1558/eap.38210
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Anastasia Kulyagina, Ariadna Sánchez-Hernández

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.








