Speculative Ecologies of Reading and the Digital Humanities: A Four-Dimensional Rereading of António Ramos Rosa’s Poetry

Bruno Ministro; Patrícia Esteves Reina

doi:10.30827/impossibilia.312026.34848

Autores/as

Bruno Ministro Institute for Comparative Literature, University of Porto https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7147-3468
Patrícia Esteves Reina Institute for Comparative Literature, University of Porto / Centre for Portuguese Literature, University of Coimbra https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0872-2134

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30827/impossibilia.312026.34848

Palabras clave:

Humanidades digitales críticas, Análisis de texto, Métodos mixtos cualitativo-cuantitativos, Investigación artística, Poesía portuguesa contemporánea, ecología

Agencias: This work was funded by the Portuguese Ministry of Education, Science and Innovation through FCT – Foundation for Science and Technology, I.P., within the scope of the research project To See the Tree and the Forest. Reading the Poetry of António Ramos Rosa from a Distance, DOI: https://doi.org/10.54499/2022.08122.PTDC.

Resumen

Este artículo explora el uso de metodologías de humanidades digitales críticas para el análisis de poesía a través de un estudio de caso del proyecto Tree and Forest (TAF). Al integrar el análisis computacional de textos, la visualización de información, métodos interpretativos mixtos y la investigación artística, TAF ofrece un enfoque multidimensional para estudiar poesía en un contexto interdisciplinario. Centrándose en la poética ecológica del poeta portugués António Ramos Rosa, el proyecto desafía los principios basados en datos, enmarcando el análisis literario como algo a la vez experimental y performativo. En este artículo ofrecemos una visión general del trabajo desarrollado por nuestro equipo a lo largo del proyecto y reflexionamos sobre sus principales resultados y contribuciones. Asimismo, examinamos críticamente las intersecciones entre las humanidades tradicionales, los métodos computacionales y la investigación-creación artística, abogando por una práctica ampliada de las humanidades digitales textuales que fomente la interpretación especulativa y la experimentación interdisciplinaria.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

BARAD, Karen (2007). Meeting the Universe Halfway. Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Duke University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv12101zq

BODE, Katherine (2017). The Equivalence of “Close” and “Distant” Reading; or, Toward a New Object for Data-Rich Literary History. Modern Language Quarterly, 78(1), 77–106. https://doi.org/10.1215/00267929-3699787 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/00267929-3699787

BURDICK, Anne; DRUCKER, Johanna; LUNENFELD, Peter; PRESNER, Todd & SCHNAPP, Jeffrey (2012). Digital_Humanities. The MIT Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9248.001.0001

CANDY, Linda (2020). The Creative Reflective Practitioner: Research through making and practice. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315208060

CARVALHO, Helena Costa (2024). Poema, ‘corpo natural’. Colóquio/Letras, 217: 98–107.

DA, Nan Z. (2019). The Computational Case against Computational Literary Studies. Critical Inquiry, 45(3), 601–639. https://doi.org/10.1086/702594 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/702594

DRUCKER, Johanna (2009). SpecLab: Digital Aesthetics and Projects in Speculative Computing. University of Chicago Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226165097.001.0001

DRUCKER, Johanna (2013). Performative materiality and theoretical approaches to interface. Digital Humanities Quarterly, 7(1). http://www.digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/7/1/000143/000143.html DOI: https://doi.org/10.63744/d9h2c6cvq8jc

DRUCKER, Johanna (2017). Why Distant Reading Isn’t. PMLA, 132(3), 628–635. https://doi.org/10.1632/pmla.2017.132.3.628 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1632/pmla.2017.132.3.628

DRUCKER, Johanna (2020). Visualization and Interpretation: Humanistic approaches to display. The MIT Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/12523.001.0001

EVE, Martin Paul (2019). Close Reading with Computers: Textual Scholarship, Computational Formalism, and David Mitchell’s Cloud Atlas. Stanford University Press. https://doi.org/10.21627/9781503609372 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21627/9781503609372

GRIGAR, Dene & O’SULLIVAN, James (Eds.). (2021). Electronic Literature as Digital Humanities: Contexts, forms, & practices. Bloomsbury. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781501363474

HAMMOND, Adam; BROOKE, Julian & HIRST, Graeme (2016). Modeling Modernist Dialogism: Close Reading with Big Data. In ROSS, S. & O’SULLIVAN, J. (Eds.), Reading Modernism with Machines (pp. 49–77). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59569-0_3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59569-0_3

HARAWAY, Donna (1997). Modest₋Witness@Second₋Millennium.FemaleMan₋Meets₋OncoMouse: Feminism and technoscience. Routledge.

IOVINO, Serenella & Oppermann, Serpil (Eds.). (2014). Material Ecocriticism. Indiana University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt16gzq85

JOCKERS, Matthew L. (2013). Macroanalysis: Digital methods and literary history. University of Illinois Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5406/illinois/9780252037528.001.0001

KOZAK, Claudia (2021). Experimental Electronic Literature from the Souths. A Political Contribution to Critical and Creative Digital Humanities. Electronic Book Review. https://doi.org/10.7273/ZD5G-ZK30

MALLEN, Enrique & MENESES, Luis (2019). Adjoined Conceptual Domains in the Bilingual Poetry of Pablo Picasso. Digital Studies/Le Champ Numérique, 9(1), 20. https://doi.org/10.16995/dscn.320 DOI: https://doi.org/10.16995/dscn.320

MANOVICH, Lev (2020). Cultural Analytics. The MIT Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/11214.001.0001

MARCINKOWSKI, Michael (2018). Methodological Nearness and the Question of Computational Literature. Digital Humanities Quarterly, 12(2). http://www.digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/12/2/000378/000378.html DOI: https://doi.org/10.63744/akhs9zawmg2j

MARQUES, Diogo & Gago, Ana (Eds.) (2020). Investigação-Experimentação-Criação: Em Arte-Ciência-Tecnologia. Publicações Universidade Fernando Pessoa. http://hdl.handle.net/10284/8875

MARQUES, Diogo (2019). O Bobo, o Sábio, O Bardo (na máquina): Processos autorreferenciais na investigação artística em ciberliteratura. Diacrítica, 33(1), 20–41. https://doi.org/10.21814/diacritica.308 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21814/diacritica.308

MEIRELES, Ana Carolina (2024). ‘O poema é um insecto frágil’: para uma breve leitura ecocrítica de António Ramos Rosa. In ADÃO, P. L. (Ed.), Ele Escrevia Sol. Nos cem anos de António Ramos Rosa (pp. 9–19). Teórica.

MENDES, Ana Paula Coutinho (2004). A poesia arborescente de António Ramos Rosa. Revista Espacio / Espaço Escrito, 23-24: 149–163.

MENDES, Ana Paula Coutinho (2024). António Ramos Rosa, ecopoeta ‘avant la lettre’ Colóquio/Letras, 217: 87–97.

MORETTI, Franco (2005). Graphs, Maps, Trees: Abstract models for a literary history. Verso.

PIPER, Andrew (2020). Can We Be Wrong? The Problem of Textual Evidence in a Time of Data. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108922036

PORTELA, Manuel (2022). Literary Simulation and the Digital Humanities: Reading, Editing, Writing. Bloomsbury. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781501385377

POSTHUMUS, Stephanie & SINCLAIR, Stéfan (2014). Reading Environment(s): Digital Humanities Meets Ecocriticism. Green Letters, 18(3), 254–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/14688417.2014.966737 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14688417.2014.966737

RETTBERG, Scott & SAUM-PASCUAL, Alexandra (2020). Introduction: Electronic Literature [Frame]works for the Digital Humanities. Electronic Book Review. https://doi.org/10.7273/vyqe-dq93

ROCKWELL, Geoffrey (2003). What is Text Analysis, Really? Literary and Linguistic Computing, 18(2), 209–219. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/18.2.209 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/18.2.209

ROSS, Shawna & O’SULLIVAN, James (Eds.) (2016). Reading Modernism with Machines: Digital Humanities and Modernist Literature. Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59569-0

SAMPLE, Mark (2015). Your Mistake was a Vital Connection: Oblique Strategies for the Digital Humanities. Sample Reality, September 5. https://samplereality.com/2015/09/05/your-mistake-was-a-vital-strategy/

SO, Richard Jean (2017). All Models Are Wrong. PMLA, 132(3), 668–673. https://doi.org/10.1632/pmla.2017.132.3.668 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1632/pmla.2017.132.3.668

SWANSTROM, Elizabeth (2016). Animal, Vegetable, Digital: Experiments in New Media Aesthetics and Environmental Poetics. The University of Alabama Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.30346844

TONRA, Justin (2021). Write My Name: Authorship in the Poetry of Thomas Moore. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003090960 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003090960

TORRES, Rui (2010). Um corvo nunca mais (Apresentação do trabalho interactivo). Revista da Faculdade de Ciências Humanas e Sociais, 7, 54–63.

TORRES, Rui (2013). Do texto digital ao cibertexto: Percursos de escrileitura. In SARMENTO, C. (Ed.), Entre Centros e Margens. Textos e práticas das novas interculturas (pp. 105–124). Centro de Estudos Interculturais / Edições Afrontamento.

UNDERWOOD, Ted (2017). A Genealogy of Distant Reading. Digital Humanities Quarterly, 11(2). http://www.digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/11/2/000317/000317.html DOI: https://doi.org/10.63744/ktwb2atwsbep

UNDERWOOD, Ted (2019). Distant Horizons: Digital Evidence and Literary Change. The University of Chicago Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226612973.001.0001

Ecologías especulativas de la lectura y las Humanidades Digitales: una relectura en cuatro dimensiones de la poesía de António Ramos Rosa

Autores/as

DOI:

Palabras clave:

Resumen

Descargas

Citas

Descargas

Publicado

Cómo citar

Número

Sección

Licencia

IMPOSSIBILIA. Revista Internacional de Estudios Literarios