Enhancing University Students’ Learning in CLIL through the Monterey Model (MM)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30827/dreh.23.2025.34630Resumen
Tanto la interdisciplinariedad como la colaboración entre la administración, el profesorado, los desarrolladores curriculares y el alumnado son fundamentales para el Aprendizaje Integrado de Contenidos y Lenguas Extranjeras (AICLE). Este artículo explora la eficacia del Modelo Monterey (MM), un enfoque integrador y colaborativo que utiliza cursos AICLE para promover el uso auténtico de la lengua en contextos reales y significativos. En este artículo, se describen dos actividades pedagógicas que mejoran la competencia lingüística del alumnado. El MM desempeña un papel crucial para facilitar el diálogo interdisciplinario, romper las barreras académicas y mejorar las habilidades colaborativas entre los estudiantes. Estas implicaciones pedagógicas proporcionan información valiosa para educadores y administradores que buscan enriquecer la enseñanza de lenguas mediante la colaboración interdisciplinaria en sus instituciones.
Descargas
Citas
American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages. (2012). ACTFL proficiency guidelines 2012. American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages. https://www.actfl.org/terms-and-conditions
Abegglen, S. (2024). Collaboration in Higher Education: Theorising Co-Creation for Inclusive Learning and Teaching Praxis. Thesis. https://pearl.plymouth.ac.uk/sc-theses/70
Altstaedter, L. L. (2016). Developing a Spanish for Health Professions Course: A Preliminary Mixed-Methods Study. Foreign Language Annals, 50(1), 38-56. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12221 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12221
Banegas, D. L. (2012). Motivation and autonomy through CLIL. A collaborative undertaking. In Anglada, L.; Banegas, D. L. (Eds.), Views on Motivation and Autonomy in ELT. Selected Papers from XVII FAAPI Conference (pp. 39-45). Apizals.
Bahrami, H. S. (2018). EFL Reading Comprehension Classes with Cultural Consciousness-raising Orientation and Multicultural Personal Traits Development. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 8(1), 113. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0801.15 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0801.15
Barkley, E. F.; Major, C. H.; Cross, K. P. (2014). Collaborative learning techniques: a handbook for college faculty. Jossey-Bass, A Wiley Brand. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/245686604_Collaborative_Learning_Techniques_A_Handbook_for_College_Faculty
Brown, H.; Bradford, A. (2017). EMI, CLIL, & CBI: Differing Approaches and Goals [Review of EMI, CLIL, & CBI: Differing Approaches and Goals]. In Transformation in English Education (pp. 328–334). Jalt.
Byram, M.; Wagner, M. (2018). Making a difference: Language teaching for intercultural and international dialogue. Foreign Language Annals, 51(1), 140-151. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12319 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12319
Carrió-Pastor, M. L. (2009). Cultural Diversity in Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL). In Carrió-Pastor, M. L. (Ed.), Content and Language Integrated Learning: Cultural Diversity (pp. 31-46). Peter Lang.
Cenoz, J. (2015). Content-based instruction and content and language integrated learning: the same or different? Language, Culture and Curriculum, 28(1), 8-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2014.1000922 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2014.1000922
Chaikovska, H.; Levchyk, I. (2022). Interdisciplinary integration of education for sustainable development into higher education institutions (Integrated ESP case study). Zhytomyr Ivan Franko State University Journal. Рedagogical Sciences, 2(109), 195-211.
https://doi.org/10.35433/pedagogy.2(109).2022.195-211 DOI: https://doi.org/10.35433/pedagogy.2(109).2022.195-211
Chekol, A.; Shiferie, K.; Teshome, S. (2023). Effects of using adjunct model of content-based instruction on students’ technical report writing performance, 10(1), Article 2214427.
https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186x.2023.2214427 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2214427
Clark, S.; Wallace, R. L. (2015) Integration and interdisciplinarity: concepts, frameworks, and education. Policy Sci 48, 233-255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-015-9210-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-015-9210-4
Council of Europe. (2001). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, and Assessment. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Coyle, D.; Dalton-Puffer, C.; Hood, P.; Marsh, D. (2010). CLIL: content and language integrated learning. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009024549
Dalton-Puffer, C. (2011). Content-and-Language Integrated Learning: From Practice to Principles? Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31(31), 182-204. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0267190511000092 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190511000092
Dalton-Puffer, C. (2007). Discourse in content and integrated learning (CLIL) classrooms. John Benjamins Pub. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.20
De Wit, H. (2019). Internationalization in Higher Education, a Critical Review. SFU Educational Review, 12(3), 9-17. https://doi.org/10.21810/sfuer.v12i3.1036 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21810/sfuer.v12i3.1036
Dörnyei, Z.; Malderez, A. (1997). Group dynamics and foreign language teaching. System, 25(1), 65-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0346-251x(96)00061-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(96)00061-9
Fortanet-Gómez, I. (2013). CLIL in Higher Education: Towards a Multilingual Language Policy. Channel View Publications. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847699374
Gallardo, F.; Martínez Adrián, M. (2015). The use of oral presentations in Higher Education: CLIL vs. English as a foreign language. Pulso, Revista de Educación, 38, 73-106. https://doi.org/10.58265/pulso.5072 DOI: https://doi.org/10.58265/pulso.5072
Howard, J. (2006). Models of Integrating Content and Language Learning [Review of Models of Integrating Content and Language Learning]. NATIONAL COUNCIL of LESS COMMONLY TAUGHT LANGUAGES (NCOLCTL). https://www.ncolctl.org/files/Models-of-integrating.pdf
Hurajová, Ľ. (2021). Can close cooperation between ESP/CLIL experts and disciplinary teachers in Higher Education lead to fostering English education environment. Journal of Teaching English for Specific and Academic Purposes, 9(1), 129-136. https://doi.org/10.22190/jtesap2101129h DOI: https://doi.org/10.22190/JTESAP2101129H
Jenkins, J. (2015). Repositioning English and multilingualism in English as a Lingua Franca. Englishes in Practice, 2(3), 49-85. https://doi.org/10.1515/eip-2015-0003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/eip-2015-0003
Kumaravadivelu’s, B. (2006). Understanding Language Teaching: From Method to Postmethod (1st ed.). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410615725
Lederach, J. P. (2003). The little book of conflict transformation. Good Books.
McPherson, M.; Smith-Lovin, L.; Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27(1), 415–444. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415
Middlebury Institute of International Studies at Monterey (2018, Feb 23) "Monterey Model" Course Showcases Learning in Language. https://www.middlebury.edu/institute/news/monterey-model-course-showcases-learning-language
Morera, S. (2020, January 23-26). The Monterey Model: Internationalizing the Curriculum through Multilingual Content-Based Instruction. 2020 International Conference on the Development and Assessment of Intercultural Competence, Tucson, AZ (USA): https://mtgsked.com/p/26882/s?locale=fr
Moser-Mercer, B. (2000). The acquisition of Interpreting Skills. In Gran, L.; Kellet, C. B. (Eds.), Signed-Language Interpretation and Training: Theoretical and Practical Aspects (pp. 57-62). Trieste (Italy): Edizione Universitá di Trieste.
Navés, T. (2009). Effective Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) Programmes. In Ruiz de Zarobe, Y.; Jiménez Catalán, R. M. (Eds.), Content and Language Integrated Learning Evidence from Research in Europe (pp. 22-40). Multilingual Matters. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.27195454.7
Newell, W. H. (2006). Decision making in interdisciplinary studies. In Morcol, G. (Ed.), Handbook of decision making (pp. 245-264). Boca Raton, FL (USA): CRC Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420016918.ch13
Nunan, D.; Bailey, K. M. (2009). Exploring second language classroom research: a comprehensive guide. Heinle, Cengage Learning.
O’Dwyer, F.; de Boer, M. (2015). Approaches to assessment in CLIL classrooms: Two case studies. Language Learning in Higher Education, 5(2), 397-421. https://doi.org/10.1515/cercles-2015-0019 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cercles-2015-0019
Oliva Parera, P. M. (2025). Critical Content-Based Instruction for Human Rights: Preliminary Findings from a University Human Trafficking Class in Spanish. In J. Watson, R. Wolfel, & A. Kalsktein (Eds.), Language, Regional Expertise, and Culture in the Military State of the Science (pp. 61–78). West Point Press. https://press.westpoint.edu/books/lrec-in-the-military/
Oliva, P. M. (2019). Dos para bailar el Tango: Fomento de la motivación en estudiantes de lenguas extranjeras por medio de contenidos en disciplinas específicas. Publicaciones, 49(2), 19–37.
https://doi.org/10.30827/publicaciones.v49i2.11343 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30827/publicaciones.v49i2.11343
Peart, S. M.; Barrett, B. S.; Crawford, S. D. (2021). Content- Based Instruction in a Spanish Language Classroom: Climate, Identity, and Historical Patterns of Latin American Migration to the United States. In de la Fuente, M. (Ed.), Education for Sustainable Development in Foreign Language Learning Content-Based Instruction in College-Level Curricula (pp. 179-196). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003080183-14
Rieckmann, M. (2018). Learning to transform the world: key competencies in Education for Sustainable Development (ESD). In Leicht, A.; Heiss, J.; Byun, W. J. (Eds.), Issues and Trends in Education for Sustainable Development (pp. 39-59). United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.
Sánchez‐Naranjo, J. (2019). Peer review and training: Pathways to quality and value in second language writing. Foreign Language Annals, 52(3), 612-643. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12414 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12414
Scott, E. K.; White, B. R. (2024). An Empirical Study of Cultivating Innovative Practice Abilities in an Interdisciplinary Education Environment in Australia. Research and Advances in Education, 3(5), 53-63. https://doi.org/10.56397/rae.2024.05.06 DOI: https://doi.org/10.56397/RAE.2024.05.06
Shaw, P, (1997). With one stone: Models of instruction and their curricular implications in an advanced content-based foreign language program. In Stryker, S. B.; Leaver, B. L. (Eds.), Content-Based instruction in foreign language education: Models and methods (pp. 261-282). Washington, DC (USA): Georgetown University Press.
St. Amant, K.; Giordano, W. (2023). Expanding Communication Expectations: Examining Audience Understanding of Scripts Through Fold and Swap Strategies. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 21, 58-78. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472816231216911 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00472816231216911
van Compernolle, R. A. (2015). The Emergence of Sociolinguistic Competence in L2 Classroom Interaction. In Markee, N. (Ed.), The Handbook of Classroom Discourse and Interaction (pp. 265-286). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118531242.ch16
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/9781118531242.ch16
van Lier, L. (2010). Foreword: Agency, self and identity in language learning. In O'Rourke, B.; Carson, L. (eds.), Language learner autonomy: Policy, curriculum, classroom (pp. ix–xviii). Bern (Switzerland): Peter Lang.
Wadensjö, C. (2016). Interpreting as interaction. Routledge.
Wang, B. (2015). Bridging the gap between interpreting classrooms and real-life interpreting. International Journal of Interpreter Education, 7, 65-73. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/288829012_Bridging_the_Gap_Between_Interpreting_Classrooms_and_Real-_World_Interpreting
Wang, B.; Ye, L. (2009). Building a corpus for interpreting training: Theory and practice. Foreign Language Circles. World (Waiyujie), 2, 23-32.
Wernicke, S. (2023). Impetus and Obstacles for Interdisciplinarity in
Higher Education Stocktaking at a German University. HINT. Heidelberg Inspirations for Innovative Teaching, 4(1), 267-290. https://doi.org/10.11588/hint.2023.1.101940
Zalli, E. (2024). Globalization and Education: Exploring the Exchange of Ideas, Values, and Traditions in Promoting Cultural Understanding and Global Citizenship. Interdisciplinary Journal of Research and Development, 11(1 S1), 55-62. https://doi.org/10.56345/ijrdv11n1s109 DOI: https://doi.org/10.56345/ijrdv11n1s109
Žefran, M.; Jolić Kozina, Š.; Bratož, S. (2024). Fostering Language Awareness in a Plurilingual Learning Environment. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 14(3), 13-33. https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.1840 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.1840
Zouaidi, C. (2024). Traditional and Current Perspectives on Pronunciation Teaching. English Language Teaching, 17(5), 35-40. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v17n5p35 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v17n5p35
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2025 Pablo M Oliva Parera, Marie Butcher
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
