Complex Argumentation in Elementary School

Jonathan Cervantes-Barraza, Guadalupe Cabañas-Sánchez, David Reid

Resumen


This paper describes a study of mathematical argumentation in primary school. The principal aim is to explore the nature of complex argumentation at a structural level. The context of the study was a teaching experiment involving nine tasks that promoted argumentation among fifth graders. We use the framework and method of reconstructing complex argumentation in the classroom proposed by Knipping (2008). The findings show that complex argumentation at a structural level in the context of refuting conclusions is characterized by a source-like structure with the addition of a new refutation argument element.



Palabras clave


Complex argumentation, refutation, argumentation structures, mathematics, primary school, teaching experiment.

Citas


Cervantes-Barraza, J. A., & Cabañas-Sánchez, G. C. (2018). Argumentos formales y visuales en argumentaciones colectivas. Educación Matemática, 30(1), 148-168.

Conner, M. (2008). Expanded Toulmin diagrams: a tool for investigating complex activity in classrooms. In O. Figueras, J. Cortina, S. Alatorre, T. Rojano, & A. Sepúlveda (Eds.). Proceedings of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Vol 2 (pp. 361-368). México, Morelia.

Conner, A. (2017). An application of Habermas’ rationality to the teacher’s actions: Analysis of argumentation in two classrooms. In T. Dooley, V. Durand-Guerrier, & G, Gueudet. (Eds.). Proceedings of the Tenth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 1-8), Dublin, Ireland: ERME.

Conner, A., Singletary, L., Smith, R., Wagner, P., & Francisco, R. (2014). Teacher support for collective argumentation: A framework for examining how teachers support students’ engagement in mathematical activities. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 86(2), 401-429.

Erkek, Ö., & Bostan, M. (2018). Prospective Middle School Mathematics Teachers’ Global Argumentation Structures. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 17(3), 613-633. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-018-9884-0

Gal, H., & Linchevski, L. (2010). To see or not to see: analyzing difficulties in geometry from the perspective of visual perception. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 74(2), 163-183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-010-9232-y

Goizueta, M., & Planas, N. (2013). El papel del contexto en la identificación de argumentaciones matemáticas por un grupo de profesores. PNA, 7(4), 155-170.

Inglis, M., & Mejía-Ramos, J. P. (2005). La fuerza de la aserción y el poder persuasivo en la argumentación en matemáticas. Revista EMA: Investigación e Innovación en Educación Matemática, 10, 327-352.

Kieran, C., Doorman, M., & Ohtani, M. (2015). Frameworks and principles for task design. In A. Watson, & M. Ohtani. (Eds.), Task design in mathematics education: An ICMI study 22 (pp. 19-74). New York: Springer.

Knipping, C. (2003). Beweisprozesse in der Unterrichtspraxis–Vergleichende Analysen von Mathematikunterricht in Deutschland und Frankreich. Hildesheim: Franzbecker Verlag.

Knipping, C. (2008). A method for revealing structures of argumentations in classroom proving processes. ZDM Mathematics Education, 40(3), 427-441.

Knipping, C., & Reid, D. (2015). Reconstructing argumentation structures: A Perspective on proving Processes in Secondary Mathematics Classroom Interactions. In A. Bikner- Ahsbahs, C.

Knipping & N. Presmeg (Eds.), Approaches to Qualitative Research in Mathematics Education: Examples of methodology and methods (pp. 75-101). Dordrecht: Springer, doi: 10. 1007/978-94-017-9181-6_4

Krummheuer, G. (1995). The ethnology of argumentation. In P. Cobb and H. Bauersfeld (Eds.). The Emergence of Mathematical Meaning: Interaction in Classroom Cultures. (pp. 229-269). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

Krummheuer, G. (2000). Mathematics Learning in Narrative Classroom Cultures: Studies of Argumentation in Primary Mathematics Education. For the Learning of Mathematics, 20(1), 22-32.

Krummheuer, G. (2015). Methods for Reconstructing Processes of Argumentation and Participation in Primary Mathematics Classroom Interaction. In A. Bikner-Ahsbahs, C. Knipping., & N. Presmeg (Eds.), Approaches to Qualitative Research in Mathematics Education: Examples of methodology and methods (pp. 75-101). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10. 1007/978-94-017-9181-6_4

Limón, M. (2001). On the cognitive conflict as an instructional strategy for conceptual change: a critical appraisal. Learning and Instruction, 11, 357-380.

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.

O’Brien, T.C., Shapiro, B.J., & Reali, N.C. (1971). Logical thinking: language and context. Educational Studies in Mathematics 4, 201–219.

Pedemonte, B. (2007). How can the relationship between argumentation and proof be analysed? Educational Studies in Mathematics 66(1), 23-41.

Ponte, J. P. (2005). Gestão curricular em Matemática. In GTI (Ed.), O professor e o desenvolvimento curricular (pp. 11-34). Lisboa: APM.

Potari, D., Zachariades, T., & Zaslavsky, O. (2010). Mathematics teachers’ reasoning for refuting students’ invalid claims. In V. Durand-Guerrier, S. Soury-Lavergne, F. Arzarello (Eds.), Proceedings of the Sixth Congress of European Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 281-290). Lyon, France: CERME 6.

Reid, D., & Knipping, C. (2010). Proof in mathematics education: Research, learning and teaching. Rotterdam: Sense.

Reid, D., Knipping, C., & Crosby, M. (2011). Refutations and the logic of practice. PNA, 6(1), 1-10.

Rumsey, C., & Langrall, C. W. (2016). Promoting mathematical argumentation. Teaching children mathematics, 22(7), 413-419.

Smith, M., & Stein, M. (1998). Selecting and creating mathematical tasks: Form research to practice. Mathematics teaching in the middle school, 3(5), 344-350.

Solar, H., & Deulofeu, J. (2016) Condiciones para promover el desarrollo de la competencia de argumentación en el aula de matemáticas. Bolema, Rio Claro (SP), 30(56), 1092-1112.

Steffe, L. P., & Thompson, P. W. (2000). Teaching experiment methodology: Underlying principles and essential elements. In R. Lesh, & A. E. Kelly (Eds.), Research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 267-307). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum

Toulmin, S. (1958/2003). The uses of argument (Updated edition). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Whitenack, J., & Yackel, E. (2002). Making Mathematical Arguments in the Primary Grades: The Importance of Explaining and Justifying Ideas. Teaching Children Mathematics, 21, 524-527.

Yackel, E. (2002). What We Can Learn from Analyzing the Teacher’s Role in Collective Argumentation. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 21(4), 423-440. http://doi. org/10.1016/S0732-3123 (02)00143-8.


Texto completo: PDF

Refbacks





La descarga de archivos se rige por la licencia Creative Commons Reconocimiento-No comercial-Sin obras derivadas

ISSN: 1887-3987